Search for: "High v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 31,562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2008, 6:07 am
If the high court takes this case, an interesting question is posed: Can participating in a fantasy baseball league require Unites States Supreme Court judges to recuse themselves? [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:05 am
Thind Revisited, which appears in the Georgetown Journal of Law & Modern Critical Race Perspectives 7 (2015): 1-42.This article reexamines the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2021, 5:11 pm
The post United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:57 am
The two Supreme Court cases that comprise the bedrock of legal precedent for the third-party doctrine—Smith v Maryland and United States v Miller—do not apply to cell site location data, the court found: We agree with the defendant…that the nature of cellular telephone technology and CSLI and the character of cellular telephone use in our current society render the third-party doctrine of Miller and Smith inapposite; the digital age has altered… [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am
J.S. claimed to be 18 and a senior in high school. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:45 am
In Friedrichs v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:09 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 4:03 am
The Court of Appeal disagreed, affirming in an unpublished opinion.Years later, the state Supreme Court decided People v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:30 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 11:55 am
Tapia v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:23 am
’” State v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:23 am
’” State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 9:50 pm
State of Punjab and Devji Vallabhbhai Tandel v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
” Barsa and Dana point out that climate change lawsuits brought under state law currently face high rates of dismissal because of federal preemption. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:07 pm
In State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:32 pm
By Patrick ZiepoltIn Bailey v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 6:52 am
Bank v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 8:00 am
The Supreme Court had previously held in the case of Chairperson of the Immigration Selection Board v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 3:59 am
FlynnOral argument is scheduled in the Michigan Supreme Court for March 6th in the juvenile lifer case of People v Raymond Carp to determine whether the SCOTUS decisions banning state juvenile lifer laws should get retroactive application. [read post]
