Search for: "Hobbs v. John" Results 161 - 180 of 210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2012, 9:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Renee Hobbs, Professor and Founding Director of the Harrington School of Communication and Media, University of Rhode Island. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
The course in question covered the history of Western legal thought and philosophers such as Plato, Aquinas, Hobbes, and Mill. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Sandy Levinson
Taney didn't do it, but, if one can accept Story's similarly-motivated opinion in Prigg v. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
: Aereo’s business model of re-transmitting TV broadcasts without a lice… http://t.co/DzKU7TYAa6 -> Link to 7th Circuit copyright decision in Hobbs v Elton John http://t.co/fjITYsePjT -> Prince copyright infringement case rolls on http://t.co/6AabYlLfog -> Australia data breach law a jobs killer? [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am by Kedar Bhatia
Johns River Water Management District 11-1447Issue: (1) Whether a land-use agency can be held liable for a taking when it refused to issue a land-use permit on the sole basis that the permit applicant did not accede to a permit condition that, if applied, would violate the essential nexus and rough proportionality tests set out in Nollan v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:59 am by Terry Hart
” • • • Redefining Free Culture was originally posted on Copyhype • • • FootnotesSee, for example, The Ethics of Consent, pp. 45-51 (Oxford University Press 2010), citing Thomas Hobbes, Adam Smith, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill.See, for example, Lynch v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Hobbs v Warner, 2019 BCSC 2196 Donegan J dismissed a defamation claim under SLAPP legislation. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In a country (and culture) that sometimes appears to believe that prevention of even one terrorist attack justifies immense costs in terms both of money and deprivations of ordinary liberty, it is at least worth noting the remarkable indifference of much of the public—and certainly the whole of the Republican Party—to the costs attached to offering the kind of capacious interpretation of the Second Amendment instantiated in the recent case of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association… [read post]