Search for: "Hoffman v State" Results 161 - 180 of 1,037
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2009, 8:37 am
  But how does this case square with Hoffman Plastic Compounds Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 2:36 pm
So holds the New York intermediate appellate court in today’s Brown v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 11:00 pm
"The Coque decision further evidences the erosion in New York of the holding of the United States Supreme Court in Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 12:36 pm by Holland & Hart
By Brian Neil Hoffman and Jeremy Ben Merkelson Brian Neil Hoffman The United States Supreme Court today narrowed the universe of plaintiffs who can claim protection under the whistleblower anti-retaliation provisions of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank). [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 12:36 pm by Holland & Hart
By Brian Neil Hoffman and Jeremy Ben Merkelson Brian Neil Hoffman The United States Supreme Court today narrowed the universe of plaintiffs who can claim protection under the whistleblower anti-retaliation provisions of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank). [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 9:10 am by Rachel Sandler
Hoffman The holiday industry in the United States is a multi-billion dollar business. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 6:58 am
The Defendants moved, inter alia, for partial summary judgment based on: (a) a claim that one of the Plaintiffs had submitted fraudulent documents when applying for employment with one of the Defendants in violation of the Immigration and Reform Control Act of 1986 ("IRCA"), which criminalizes the presentation of forged evidence of entitlement to employment within the United States; and (b) the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Hoffman Plastic… [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 6:02 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Sharona Hoffman, Portable Medical Order Sets (POLST®): Ethical and Legal Landscape, (15 NAELA Journal 1 (Fall 2019)).Helen M. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 5:51 am by Sean Wajert
A tip of the hat to our DRI colleague Mike Weston for alerting us to an interesting 10th Circuit opinion from a couple weeks ago, Hoffman v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 2:16 am
Thus, the Federal Circuit held that Congress did not evince an intention to permit an application having additional disclosure to benefit from the § 121 safe harbor.Patent Docs also noted:Interestingly, the lawyer representing Pfizer before the Federal Circuit, Leora Ben-Ami of Kaye Scholer LLP, is also the lead trial attorney representing Hoffman-LaRoche against Amgen.IPBiz questions whether the Pfizer v. [read post]