Search for: "Hoffmann v. Hoffmann"
Results 161 - 180
of 463
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
On the other hand, it has been suggested that the decision in Callery v Gray approving a figure as a reasonable premium in road traffic cases at the time has set that figure as a base-line and has resulted in the eradication of downward pressure in the market; and that the requirement for a Rogers v Merthyr Tydfil statement does not in practice ensure that premiums are competitive".Later the Report observes: "In Callery v Gray (Nos 1 and 2) [2002] UKHL 28 Lord… [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:20 am
Lord Hoffmann, giving the judgment, cited a Law Commission review of the law on limitation which had branded Stubbings an “anomaly”. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am
From Tuesday 13 March until Wednesday 14 March 2012 is the Privy Council hearing of The Queen ex p Mario Hoffmann v The Commissioner for the Turks & Caicos Islands Commission of Inquiry (2008-2009) and The Governor of the Turks & Caicos Islands, to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:27 pm
The case is Kathleen Rossitto v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:27 pm
The case is Kathleen Rossitto v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:17 pm
" Quoting Lord Hoffmann in Cambridge Gas Transportation Corpn. v Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Navigator Holdings plc and Others [2007] 1 AC 508, Mrs. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 2:30 am
He cites Lord Hoffmann quoting the Technical Board of Appeal of the EPO in Exxon/Fuel Oils (T 409/91) [1994] O.J. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:00 am
Gaza conflict a “lawful excuse” In R v ? [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm
George v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:22 am
The leading case on the subject for several years has been Lawson v Serco and, in particular, Lord Hoffmann’s Judgment on the question “what connection between Great Britain and the employment relationship is required to make section 94(1) the appropriate choice of law in deciding whether and in what circumstances an employee can complain that his dismissal was unfair? [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 12:02 am
Hoffmann, Counterclaims John Y. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:50 am
In Lawson v Serco Ltd [2006] UKHL 3, Lord Hoffmann identified three categories of employees who would fall within the jurisdiction of the employment tribunal: employees working in Great Britain; peripatetic employees where the employee is ‘based’ in Great Britain; and, in some exceptional cases, expatriate employees [9-12]. [read post]
20 May 2009, 5:39 am
The recent cases of World Wise Partners Ltd v RBTT (2008) and Smith v NCB (2008) were cited as examples. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 10:20 pm
It is submitted, however, that Lord Hoffmann’s approach is in fact a most useful way of analysing this issue, and some of the criticism is perhaps a result of the belief that Lord Hoffmann intended a formulaic classification of definitions as “legal” or “commercial”. [read post]
2 May 2018, 11:16 pm
" (Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
State v. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am
As Lord Hoffmann said in the Privy Council libel case of Gleaner v Abrahams ([2004] 1 AC 628) “Personal injury awards are almost always made in actions based on negligence or breach of statutory duty rather than intentional wrongdoing. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:36 pm
" ICS v West Bromwich (per Lord Hoffmann).So it's not what you, your client or the other side think or wished it means. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:23 am
Hoffmann-La Roche AG and Genentech Inc. | Design v Copyright in Italy | Unitary patent and double patenting | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd & Anor | IKEA in Indonesia | Eli Lilly v Janssen Sciences. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:00 pm
The notice requirement, itself, had been confirmed in Frits Loendersloot v George Ballantine & Sons Ltd [1977] ECR I-227. [read post]
