Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 4,253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2023, 4:59 pm
On May 18, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a unanimous decision in the case of Amgen Inc. et al. v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:37 am
The Court is considering if the trademark holder is protected by the Lanham Act or if the toys’ producer instead receives heightened First Amendment protection due to the humorous nature of the dog toys, among other factors.Merrill v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 3:35 pm
Previously, Judge Bumb served for 15 years as an Assistant United States Attorney. [read post]
11 May 2023, 5:01 am
§ 1702(a)(1)(B), extends to “any property in which any foreign country or a national thereof has any interest by any person, or with respect to any property, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]
10 May 2023, 6:02 am
As Tocqueville observed long before Ken Paxton and his ilk blighted the federal courts, "[s]carcely any political question arises in the United States that is not resolved, sooner or later, into a judicial question. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
7 May 2023, 12:52 am
In the United States as well as in Germany, claim construction is resolved by courts as a question of law (not fact). [read post]
6 May 2023, 2:49 pm
” There seems to be only one relevant precedent: Televest v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 7:48 am
SEP holders’ innovation incentives The second claim is that SEP holders’ innovation incentives would diminish significantly, or even disappear, if their net royalty income decreased. [read post]
2 May 2023, 7:49 am
Case date: 09 March 2023 Case number: No. 22-1907 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
1 May 2023, 8:45 am
See United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 1:39 pm
In turn, this may undermine the geopolitical interests of both the EU and the United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 11:34 am
If you’re an immigrant or visa-holder in the United States and believe you’ve been affected by this social media monitoring, the ACLU wants to hear your story. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 2:55 am
For a detailed overview of Ruscoe v Cryptopia,please refer to our previous publication: Cryptocurrencies are property capable of being held on trust, New Zealand High Court holds The Hon Madam Justice Linda Chan noted that “the preponderance of jurisprudence recognises the proprietary nature of cryptocurrencies” and included case law on cryptocurrencies being considered as “property” (or similar definition) in various jurisdictions including England and Wales, the… [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 11:37 am
Petrella v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:37 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 5:43 am
In addition, the European Union, along with the United States and others, is currently involved in a dispute at the World Trade Organization (WTO) over China’s ASI procedures in these cases (a detailed discussion of China’s ASI landscape can be found here). [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
In 2010, Judge Brookman received the Director’s Award from United States Attorney General Eric Holder, in Washington, DC, for superior performance as an Assistant United States Attorney, for his work on the United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 1:18 pm
Copyright holders/fair users? [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 12:31 am
That first SEP AASI (Nokia v. [read post]
