Search for: "Home Ins. Co. v. New York" Results 161 - 180 of 290
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2022, 6:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendant does not, however, establish that “the court overlooked or misapprehended the relevant facts, or misapplied any controlling principle oflaw” (Pro Brokerage, Inc. v Home Ins. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 1:34 pm by Gene Killian
  Facts:  Pacific Indemnity sold a fire insurance policy to an entity known as Quaker Hills, which owned a custom-built home in upstate New York. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
There’s nothing it can do about it, since it has no control over the competitor – short of closing its eyes to a potentially breakthrough new use for its product.DDLaw, More Thoughts On Conte v. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 9:23 am
  On November 5, 2020 the plaintiffs suffered a total fire loss of their recently purchased New City, New York home and initiated a claim with defendant UPCIC under their homeowners insurance policy. [read post]