Search for: "Housing Authority v. City Council"
Results 161 - 180
of 996
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
May) v Birmingham City Council [2012] EWHC 1399 “there is all the difference in the world … between a person knowing that at some point in the future they may have to leave accommodation and a person being told that they will not have somewhere to sleep that night. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:40 am
Khazai & Ors, R (on the application of) v Birmingham City Council [2010] EWHC 2576 (Admin) We've been waiting for this one. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:40 am
Khazai & Ors, R (on the application of) v Birmingham City Council [2010] EWHC 2576 (Admin) We've been waiting for this one. [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:36 am
Oxford City Council v Bull [2011] EWCA Civ 609 In which the Court of Appeal had to consider whether the homeless applicant had made himself intentionally homeless and whether he was in priority need. [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:36 am
Oxford City Council v Bull [2011] EWCA Civ 609 In which the Court of Appeal had to consider whether the homeless applicant had made himself intentionally homeless and whether he was in priority need. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am
City residents administratively appealed the City zoning adjustment board’s approval to the City Council, arguing in relevant part that the project’s “unusual size, location, nature and scope will have significant environmental impact on its surroundings” as it would be “one of the largest houses in Berkeley, four times the average house size in its vicinity, and situated in a canyon where the existing… [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 2:41 pm
So it was with some interest that I read the Court of Appeal decision in Begum v Birmingham City Council [2015] EWCA Civ 386. [read post]
4 May 2022, 1:06 pm
The Court of Appeal adopted the decision of the Court of Appeal in R (Aweys and others) v Birmingham City Council (2008) EWCA Civ 48 (our note) on s.193 duties, to the extent that this was not changed by the House of Lords decision in what was then called Ali v Birmingham City Council (our note), which was decided on different grounds and not on the issue in this case. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 1:45 pm
That can be seen from, for example, the decision of the House of Lords in Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council (2001) UKHL 57, (2002) 1 AC 547 and, more recently, that of the Court of Appeal in Waltham Forest London Borough Council v Saleh. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm
But the approach taken by the Court of Appeal in R v Wandsworth London Borough Council, Ex p O [2000] 1 WLR 2539 remained the law and had not been changed by the House of Lords in M v Slough. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm
But the approach taken by the Court of Appeal in R v Wandsworth London Borough Council, Ex p O [2000] 1 WLR 2539 remained the law and had not been changed by the House of Lords in M v Slough. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 4:38 pm
This is a matter of judgment for the local housing authority in each individual case. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:07 am
R (Barkas) v North Yorkshire County Council & Anor [2014] UKSC 31 Barkas concerned a playing field in Helredale, Whitby, North Yorkshire, on land owned by Scarborough Borough Council, who maintained the Field as “recreation grounds” pursuant to the Housing Act 1985, s 12(1) and its predecessor statutes. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
The applicants were occupiers of housing units owned by Lambeth borough council under leases which had been provided by a charitable housing trust. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm
Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council (2002) 1 AC 547, Omar v Westminster City Council (2008) HLR 36 (our report), Abed v City of Westminster (2011) EWCA Civ 1406 (our report), and Temur v Hackney LBC (2014) HLR 39 (our report) had all variously held that the facts relevant at review were those that pertained at the date of the review, not at the date of the original decision. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 1:21 pm
Samuels v Birmingham City Council (2019) UKSC 28 The Supreme Court, finally, has delivered its judgment on the issue of the assessment of ‘reasonable expenses’ when considering the affordability of rent in homelessness decisions. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 2:36 pm
Makisi v Birmingham City Council (Birmingham County Court Appeal Ref: BM9 0166A, 6 Jan 2010) This was the County Court hearing of a s.204 Housing Act 1996 appeal following s.202 review of a decision that an offer of accommodation was suitable and reasonable to accept, and subsequent discharge of duty under s.193. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Pinnock v Manchester City Council [2010] UKSC 45 (Supreme Court pdf & BAILII links) Whenever a battle weary group of housing lawyers gets together, conversation inevitably turns (after the routine complaints about the less congenial DJs) to the thorny issue of which is the most important housing law case of all. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Pinnock v Manchester City Council [2010] UKSC 45 (Supreme Court pdf & BAILII links) Whenever a battle weary group of housing lawyers gets together, conversation inevitably turns (after the routine complaints about the less congenial DJs) to the thorny issue of which is the most important housing law case of all. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 9:38 am
Ill. 1994) (holding that the Fourth Amendment barred warrantless sweeps through public housing projects); Resident Action Council v. [read post]
