Search for: "Howes v. Workers Compensation Bureau"
Results 161 - 166
of 166
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2008, 8:42 am
What makes this case particularly unsettling for Ohio employers is the fact that the settlement was entered into and approved by the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (BWC) in 1997 – more than ten years ago. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 8:05 am
[Federal Register: April 8, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 68)][Rules and Regulations][Page 18944-18956]From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov][DOCID:fr08ap08-3] --------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 8 CFR Parts 214 and 274a [DHS No. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
Issue: Whether time unionized workers spent donning and doffing protective equipment was excluded from mandatory compensation under section 3(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 1:46 pm
Smith’s claim was denied administratively by the Industrial Commission of Ohio, and he filed a notice of appeal and complaint in the Lake County Court of Common Pleas naming both the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (BWC) and Kaleal as defendants. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
How can we expect to attract and retain the best and brightest legal minds when a newly minted lawyer fresh out of law school can earn more than our most senior jurists? [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 7:00 am
"They told us that if we made it harder for workers hurt on the job to get compensation, things would improve. [read post]
