Search for: "Hudson v. US Government" Results 161 - 180 of 604
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2018, 2:52 am by Wim Alberts
Alternatively, the government argued that trademarks are commercial speech implicating only the intermediate level of scrutiny set forth in the famous Central Hudson case. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 7:00 am by Elizabeth Samson
by Elizabeth Samson [Elizabeth Samson, Esq. is a Visiting Fellow at the Hudson Institute] This is our sixth post of our Symposium on the Functional Approach to the Law of Occupation. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 3:13 am by Ben Vernia
She then rejected the company’s contention that the settlement agreement made such a trial unnecessary: the Supreme Court had noted in Hudson v. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
To survive the Central Hudson test, section 1052(c) must advance a substantial government interest and be narrowly tailored to serve that interest.[7] The government argues that the provision advances a government interest in protecting the right of publicity of public figures from having their names used in trademarks without their consent. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:00 am by Ronald Collins and David Hudson
David Hudson, Jr. is an assistant professor of law at Belmont University. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:21 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Soeren Kern (Hudson New York) reports: An Austrian appellate court has upheld the conviction of Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, a Viennese housewife and anti-Jihad activist, for “denigrating religious beliefs” after giving a series of seminars about the dangers of radical Islam. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 1:54 pm by Gyi Tsakalakis
Comm'n of NY, 447 US 557 - Supreme Court 1980, citing Bates v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:42 am
  Thus, under Reed’s “topic”-based approach, there doesn’t seem to be the need any longer to go through the “commercial speech” rigmarole of Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. [read post]