Search for: "I.C."
Results 161 - 180
of 277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2008, 12:34 am
Rule 9(G)(1)(b)(i) (which references I.C. 31-19-19-1 et. seq.), and Admin. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 2:26 am
The patentee (i.c. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 12:37 pm
I.C. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 11:58 am
The following restated issue is dispositive of the appeal: Did conviction under I.C. 35-43-6-12(a)(4) violate due process when the defendant was charged under I.C. 35-43-6-12(a)(3)? [read post]
13 May 2008, 2:41 pm
I.C. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 2:11 am
I.C. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am
(These are I.C. and I.D. below.) [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
A method for the purpose of producing bovine milk having a reduced level of saturated fatty acids relative to the level of unsaturated fatty acids by:(a) determining which cows of a herd produce milk containing only beta-casein having a proline at position 67, where the herd comprises cows that produce milk containing beta-casein having a proline at position 67 and cows that produce milk containing beta-casein having a histidine at position 67, by genotyping and/or phenotyping bovine cows on the… [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:40 pm
[Here are some of my thoughts; a Res Gestae paper may follow. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:20 am
In this opposition appeal, the Board found that claim 1 of the Main Request, relating to a high strength pearlitic steel rail defined by several ranges of alloying elements, although overlapping with the composition of a pearlitic rail disclosed in D1, is novel. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:20 am
In this opposition appeal, the Board found that claim 1 of the Main Request, relating to a high strength pearlitic steel rail defined by several ranges of alloying elements, although overlapping with the generic composition of a pearlitic rail disclosed in D1, is novel. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 1:32 am
The use claim should therefore be interpreted as including the technical effect as a functional feature of the claim.Another principle of novelty is that it is not possible to combine documents in a novelty attack (Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, I.C.4.2). [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 12:56 am
The Board of Appeal first pointed to case law that the boundaries of a range cannot anticipate a specific value in that range (Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, I.C.4.1). [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:37 pm
But the discussion in section I.C. of the opinion is a bit off. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 6:48 am
In a case of alleged prior public use, the burden of proof is on the opponent to substantiate the when, what, and how of the public use (Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, I.C.3.2.4). [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 9:22 pm
The Idaho Tort Claims Act, I.C. section 6-904(3) states the following: "A governmental entity and its employees while acting withing the course and scope of their employment and without malice or criminal intent shall not be liable for any claim which ... arises out of ...false imprisonment.... [read post]
30 May 2008, 11:23 am
I.C. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 7:56 am
. * * * In summary, this action is not governed by I.C. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 6:34 am
” I.C. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 11:30 am
I.C. [read post]
