Search for: "I.C."
Results 161 - 180
of 275
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
Moreover, a mere difference in wording as in the claim in suit is insufficient to establish novelty (see also Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO, 6th edition 2010, I.C.3.2.1). [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 5:30 am
I.C. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 12:12 pm
None of the other 100+ "Authorized Dealers" are named defendants.The Plaintiff's lawyer undoubtedly selected these two defendants to help obtain jurisdiction in Indiana, because Indiana has the most favorable "right of publicity" statute in the United States (Click here to see the statute: I.C. 32-36). [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 9:41 am
I.C. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:48 pm
The sellers completed the Sales Disclosure Form, as required by I.C. 32-21-5-7, at closing. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm
However, according to the established jurisprudence of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO the common general knowledge of a skilled person is normally represented by encyclopaedias, textbooks, dictionaries and handbooks on the subject in question or even patent specifications and scientific publications in the case that the field of research is so new that technical knowledge was not available from textbooks (see case law of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO, 5th edition 2006, I.C.1.5). [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 3:00 pm
Clelland was cited for following too close, I.C. 49-638 [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm
Thus, the Board finds that the present case is rather to be decided according to the established case law already recalled in the decision under appeal, i.e. by taking into account that a prior art document does not render available matter whose identification requires twofold selection among two lists of alternatives in that document (see Case Law of the Board of Appeal, 5th Edition, 2006, I.C.4.2.3). [1.5] Therefore, the Board concurs with the finding of the OD that the subject-matter of… [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:14 pm
App. 2004)(citing I.C. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:01 pm
However, the Board remarks that according to the established jurisprudence of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO the common general knowledge of a skilled person is normally represented by encyclopaedias, textbooks, dictionaries and handbooks on the subject in question or even patent specifications and scientific publications in the case that the field of research is so new that technical knowledge was not available from textbooks (see case law of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO, 5th edition 2006,… [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 5:07 am
See I.C. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:40 pm
Cox, 260 Ind. 448, 452, 296 N.E.2d 422, 425 (1973) (discussing the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, currently codified at I.C. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 9:41 am
" In reaching its holding, the Court relied on what is known as the "absolute bar" provision found in Paragraph 2 of I.C. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:07 am
We express no opinion as to whether those claims have merit under the facts of this case, nor whether they would avoid the planning and design immunity provided by I.C. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 1:32 pm
In particular, the decision to apply so-called “intermediate scrutiny” to gun restrictions generally was mistaken, for reasons mentioned in Part I.C.2.a-c of my article. 3. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 4:01 pm
According to the definition of the Boards of appeal the content of encyclopaedias, manuals and dictionaries normally represents the common general knowledge (see Case Law of the BA of the EPO, 5th edition 2006, I.C.1.5, page [48]). [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 7:41 am
” I.C. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 7:19 am
Richard, 812 NE 2d 222, gives us an idea of how not to address a questionable child of the marriage: In the case at bar, Carl and Carmen’s divorce was finalized on September 15, 2000, and C.R.R. was born on June 1, 2001—well within the 300 day period set forth in I.C. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 4:40 am
I.C. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 9:55 am
The remainder of the damages inure to the exclusive benefit of a nondependent parent or nondependent child of the decedent in accordance with I.C. [read post]
