Search for: "ICON Health & Fitness IncĀ " Results 161 - 180 of 221
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2012, 6:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  In Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:45 am by Steven Boutwell
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. and Highmark v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:46 am by Lyle Denniston
Icon Health & Fitness Inc. (12-1184), challenging the Federal Circuit’s test for determining when an entity accused of infringing on a patent but who wins the case can be awarded attorney’s fees to pay for the defense it mounted to the claim. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:11 pm by John Ehrett
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. for imposing attorney fees under the similarly-worded 35 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 10:53 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 572 U.S. 545 (2014), which was a patent case, should guide district courts when facing attorney fee applications under the Lanham Act. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 4:33 pm by Chris Castle
The 2003 edition of Susan Bordo’s Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body (misdated 1899) is assigned to Health & Fitness—not a labeling you could imagine coming from its publisher, the University of California Press, but one a classifier might come up with on the basis of the title, like the Religion tag that Google assigns to a 2001 biography of Mae West that’s subtitled An Icon in Black and White or the Health &… [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am by Amy Howe
Icon Health and Fitness and Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
 Whereas Weird Al’s Grammy-winning song fits snugly within the parody definition (and Yankovic always seeks permission, in order “to maintain relationships”), Dumb Starbucks position is questionable.ParodyIn the landmark decision addressing fair-use in Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music, Inc the US Supreme Court stated that parody "is the use of some elements of a prior author's composition to create a new one that, at least in part,… [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 7:03 am by Mary Dwyer
Icon Health and Fitness 12-1184Issue: Whether the Federal Circuit’s promulgation of a rigid and exclusive two-part test for determining whether a case is “exceptional” under 35 U.S.C. [read post]