Search for: "IN RE: RULES GOVERNING COMPLAINTS ON JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT"
Results 161 - 180
of 197
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2010, 4:40 am
" Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi are all in the Fifth Circuit, where, as a general matter: The first-to-file rule is based on "principles of comity and sound judicial administration. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 7:20 am
” [6] As long as the SLC’s investigation and analysis withstand judicial review under Zapata, the SLC may decide to dismiss an action, or to prosecute it, as its business judgment directs. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 5:24 am
Rather, it affirms a sanction imposed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37 for “gross negligence” and “willful misconduct” by the plaintiff’s lawyers. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 1:48 pm
Although it prevailed on the unemployment compensation dispute, it has received a judicial ruling that one of its employee engaged in potentially illegal conduct, and it appears that it is facing a fairly substantial CEPA claim, with the employee claiming that the Hospital routinely directed her to routinely engage in this misconduct. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
Morton High School, 144 F.3d 448, 455 (7th Cir. 1998) (Conley’s “no set of facts” language “has never been taken literally”) (citation and quotation marks omitted).That judicial reluctance starts at the top. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 2:32 pm
” But, among those who specialize in criminal law, the case has a higher profile because of its broad challenge to the constitutionality of the federal law that criminalizes any form of fraud, if the misconduct deprived another of “the intangible right of honest services. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Federal court papers on a settlement between the government and the Indiana-based company say that Cummins shipped heavy duty diesel engines to vehicle equipment manufacturers between 1998 and 2006 without including pollution control equipment. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
And according to Adam Ozimek, we’re still a lot freer in Canada than in the U.S., The true north really is strong and free these days. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 10:20 am
How can we be letting our government do what they’re doing? [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 4:04 am
” The House bill also would expressly bar a federal court from using the Iqbal and Twombly analysis, stating a court shall not dismiss a complaint “on the basis of a determination by the judge that the factual contents of the complaint do not show the plaintiff's claim to be plausible or are insufficient to warrant a reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged. [read post]
Federal Court Sends Franchisee-Franchisor Trade Secret and Breach of Contract Dispute To Arbitration
15 Sep 2009, 11:55 am
Apart from its colorful facts, the court’s ruling is significant. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 7:10 am
In re: Complaint of Judicial Misconduct [U.S. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
: Federal Administrative Court rulings in CALVI and TRELLEBORG cases (International Law Office) Motion marks: Swiss IPO allows Swisscom to file MPG-file of motion mark in motion (Class 46) United Kingdom Class dispute over similarity of goods too complex for summary judgment: Daimler AG v Sany Group Co Ltd (Class 46) The war on counterfeits: how much would you spend? [read post]
27 May 2009, 9:32 am
Apparently, he would sit down with the court reporter after the trials, which happened to be a woman he knew personally, and re-wrote what they thought was relevant from the trial hearings. [read post]
7 May 2009, 1:04 am
" The judge concluded that Waters & Kraus had re-filed in California a case that was first filed in Texas as a way to force a settlement. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 2:34 pm
In Re Citigroup Inc. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 7:29 pm
Apparently, he would sit down with the court reporter after the trials, which happened to be a woman he knew personally, and re-wrote what they thought was relevant from the trial hearings. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:20 pm
This high standard seemed adequate to protect directors from inappropriate judicial second guessing. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:20 pm
This high standard seemed adequate to protect directors from inappropriate judicial second guessing. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Webb, No. 06-5806 An order denying a 28 U.S.C. section 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus from a conviction for assault is affirmed over claims that judicial bias, ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and his invalid plea of guilty warranted reversal of the district court's decision. [read post]
