Search for: "IN RE ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT TO RULE 6-1(a) OF THE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND COURT OF APPEALS"
Results 161 - 180
of 464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
Respondents’ boycott thus has no special characteristics meriting an exemption from the per se rules of antitrust law.6 Thus, the Supreme Court found that the antitrust laws at issue were balanced against countervailing First Amendment values at the definitional level, and this in turn meant that there was no need to do an ad hoc balancing of the competing interests, taking into account the particular defendants’ interests, as the… [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
It amended Family Court Act 812 to include it in the list of crimes that constitute a family offense and added it to Criminal Procedure Law 530. 11 The Civil Rights Law was amended to add new cause of action, in Civil Rights Law § 52–b titled Private right of action for unlawful dissemination or publication of an intimate image. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 8:09 am
On October 22, 2021, Defendants filed a notice of appeal of the district court’s ruling to the Seventh Circuit. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:54 am
As expected, Texas appealed the ruling to the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
7 May 2015, 10:35 am
It does not rule on the Fourth Amendment question. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Similar trial court rulings against the other two parishes are also on appeal.)9. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed most of the FCC’s Restoring Internet Freedom Order [1]largely on Chevron Doctrine deference grounds. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed most of the FCC’s Restoring Internet Freedom Order [1]largely on Chevron Doctrine deference grounds. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
The clarified standard for rule 12(b)(6) motions adopted here will apply to any amended complaint that the plaintiffs may file.Iannacchino v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 7:21 am
The plaintiffs plan to appeal the verdict. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:50 am
The Supreme Court will almost certainly issue its decision in Burwell v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:02 pm
In issues two through four, Doggett argues that The Travis Law Firm cannot recover attorney’s fees from a prior lawsuit as actual damages because (1) the Texas Supreme Court has not adopted an equitable exception to the general rule regarding attorney’s fees; (2) an attorney representing himself does not incur attorney’s fees; and (3) The Travis Law Firm was not a prevailing party in the prior lawsuit. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Bissonnette, No. 081094 In a conviction for first degree murder, denial of writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over claims that: 1) the trial judge's instruction to the jury that the prosecution "does not have the burden of proving that no one else may have committed the murder" was an error that was contrary to clearly established Supreme Court precedent as stated in In re Winship; and 2) the trial court violated defendant's Sixth… [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There are 9 CEQA cases pending at the California Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court of Canada addressed the mandate of the Law Society in Green. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 11:44 am
For one thing, it's way down at the bottom - and we don't mean alphabetically - of our roster of states that have adopted the learned intermediary rule. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 12:30 pm
Supreme Court (in a different detainee's case, 2008): Oh yes it is. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
He then filed a motion forpostconviction relief, followed by an amended Rule 3.850 motion. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Cases Pending There are eight CEQA cases pending at the California Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:49 am
This ruling was affirmed by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
