Search for: "IN RE ADOPTION OF B.R"
Results 161 - 180
of 188
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2007, 3:59 am
In re SPhinX, Ltd., 351 B.R. 103, 117 (Bankr. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 4:16 pm
, In re Global Service Group, LLC, 316 B.R. 451, 456-59 (Bankr. [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 3:01 am
The opposite position was adopted in the In re Wilson, 356 B.R. 114, (Bankr.S.Del.2006) and In re Hartwick, 352 B.R. 867 (Bankr.D.Minn.2006) cases which held that the debtor can deduct the vehicle ownership whether or not a debtor actually has a note or lease payment.On July 13, 2007, apparently the first decision on this issue in the Southern District of Florida was issued in In re Benedetti, ___ B.R. ___, 2007 WL 2083576… [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 11:40 am
On July 6, 2007, the court in In re Electric Machinery Enterprises, Inc., ___ B.R. ___, 2007 WL 3031445 (Bkrtcy.M.D.Fla.) [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 3:46 am
On June 20, 2007 the decision in In re Ellinger, ___ B.R. ___, 2007 WL 1976750 (Bkrtcy.D.Minn.) [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 4:24 pm
The Ninth Circuit adopted the holding of an earlier BAP decision, In re Sierra Steel, Inc., 96 B.R. 271, 274 (Bankr. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 6:37 am
In re Durham,361 B.R. 206, 209 (Bankr. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:05 pm
Markell (a philosophical wizard who is one of the bankruptcy bench's most capable Code constructionists) in In re Trejos, 352 B.R. 249 (Bankr. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 6:59 am
The Court adopted the reasoning set forth in In re Ramussen, 349 B.R. 747 (Bankr.M.D. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 10:52 am
In re Duke, 345 B.R. 806 (Bankr.W.D.Ky.2006). [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 8:23 am
Dupuis (In re Dupuis), 265 B.R. 878, 885 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio 2001). [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 10:32 am
In the case of In re Essential Therapeutics, 295 B.R. 203 (Bankr. [read post]
15 May 2007, 12:52 am
"), with In re Hall, 222 B.R. 275, 278 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1998) ( "Although courts have criticized Mendez, it remains binding precedent in this circuit"). [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 1:27 am
United States, 355 B.R. 758 (D. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 3:27 am
Per In re Schumann, Not Reported in B.R., 2005 WL 3465624 (Bkrtcy. [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 2:30 pm
Notwithstanding the sua sponte opinion in In re Attorneys At Law and Debt Relief Agencies, 332 B.R. 66 (Bankr. [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 2:30 pm
Notwithstanding the sua sponte opinion in In re Attorneys At Law and Debt Relief Agencies, 332 B.R. 66 (Bankr. [read post]
4 Aug 2006, 8:54 am
In re National Gas Distributors, LLC, __ B.R. __, 2006 WL 2135557 (Bankr. [read post]
4 Aug 2006, 8:54 am
In re National Gas Distributors, LLC, __ B.R. __, 2006 WL 2135557 (Bankr. [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm
post, where we mentioned the Hubbard, 333 B.R. 377, Valdez, 335 B.R. 801, and Rios, 336 B.R. 177 cases, all of which have effectively held that a filing by a debtor who has not completed the counseling requirements should be stricken, such that it will not count as a prior case in the event of a subsequent filing (the Valdez case actually "dismisses" rather than "strikes", but nonetheless makes clear that it will not be considered as a "case in… [read post]
