Search for: "IN RE ADOPTION OF PROCEDURES FOR THE NOTICE AND FILING OF OPINIONS"
Results 161 - 180
of 497
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2019, 11:44 am
” As a result, Congress made the notice requirement optional for all works. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:36 pm
With mounting outrage, rebuked employers and noncitizen workers are channeling Howard Beale from the venerable film Network, and screaming, “We’re as mad as hell, and we’re not going to take this anymore! [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:36 pm
With mounting outrage, rebuked employers and noncitizen workers are channeling Howard Beale from the venerable film Network, and screaming, “We’re as mad as hell, and we’re not going to take this anymore! [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 12:35 pm
Watkins’ adopted children/grandchildren didn’t get notice of this proceeding, so they didn’t get a share of the property. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
This procedure placed both parties at serious risk. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 12:04 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court ordered an extensive hearing regarding the failure to follow proper calibration procedures by Sergeant Dennis. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:18 pm
The judicial opinion, Schnatter v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
In an opinion full of words, only one was subject to the meaning making that centered the opinion. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm
Opinion filed December 18, 2018. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
(F073634; nonpublished opinion; Stanislaus County Superior Court; 2006153.) [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 8:16 am
BIS published a notice requesting information on emerging technologies. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 8:16 am
BIS published a notice requesting information on emerging technologies. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 10:17 pm
The Trust filed a notice of appeal. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:29 pm
Opinion of the Houston Court of Appeals: In re Vantage, No. 01-17-00592-CV, 555 S.W.3d 629 (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:08 pm
A supplemental return later filed by respondents stated they had filed a return prior to the required date; that they had adopted resolutions setting aside those that had approved the project, conducted a new noise study, and prepared a new Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration; and that following duly noticed public proceedings the city council adopted new resolutions again approving the project. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
This Court invited the parties to file supplemental pleadings and briefs. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 5:17 am
In re Slatten, No. 14-3007 (D.C. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:15 am
This is likely because the time within which to file a petition is short; the “Last date to petition Tax Court” is required by an off-Code provision to be stated on the notice of deficiency; the notice of deficiency does not say that there is also a refund option available (as noted here on pp.902-903); and the Tax Court helps facilitate filing with a simplified petition form that is available online. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
” Moving to the substantive claims, the appellate court held that the County violated CEQA because the 2016 Guidelines established a GHG threshold of significance without following the required adoption procedures. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 2:28 pm
(The Court’s opinion, filed September 14 and later ordered published on September 27, 2018, denied the parties’ motions to dismiss and strike and related requests for judicial notice as moot in light of its disposition on the merits.) [read post]
