Search for: "IN RE DELL INC. "
Results 161 - 180
of 226
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2009, 12:15 pm
If you think this resembles a continuing education project, you’re exactly right. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(EDTexweblog.com) US Army - More DOA patents (12:01 Tuesday) US Copyright - Decisions Reporting on 6th Circuit decision in Bridgeport Music v UMG Recordings concerning copyright in 'Bow wow wow, yippie yo, yippie yea' and accompanying musical elements (The 1709 Copyright Blog) (Property, intangible) District Court W D Washington dismisses Freedom of Information Act suit for information on counterfeit seizures: Watkins v US Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (Seattle Trademark Lawyer)… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog)… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(EDTexweblog.com) US Army - More DOA patents (12:01 Tuesday) US Copyright - Decisions Reporting on 6th Circuit decision in Bridgeport Music v UMG Recordings concerning copyright in 'Bow wow wow, yippie yo, yippie yea' and accompanying musical elements (The 1709 Copyright Blog) (Property, intangible) District Court W D Washington dismisses Freedom of Information Act suit for information on counterfeit seizures: Watkins v US Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (Seattle Trademark Lawyer)… [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 12:31 pm
Dell, Inc., 2:08cv244 (E.D. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 11:12 am
Dell, Inc. et al, 2:07-cv-00221 (E.D. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 12:21 pm
Dell, Inc. et al, 2:07cv00221)(E.D. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Current owner Lucent disingenuously sued Dell and Gateway over it, while Microsoft software was the real culprit. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 8:10 am
Abstrax, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 6:15 pm
- 17% of young in Hong Kong don’t know they are breaking copyright law when illegally downloading (Innovationpartners) Ireland High Court order forcing Eircom to block Pirate Bay doesn’t persuade UPC to do the same (1709 Copyright Blog) Netherlands Mininova ordered to remove all ‘infringing’ torrents (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) Romania Pirate Bay clone threatened by Romanian RIAA (TorrentFreak) Sweden The Pirate… [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 12:46 pm
Amicus briefs by HP and Dell focus on the permanent injunction. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 9:00 am
” Bet they’re at least temporarily breaking out the bubbly at little i4i, Inc. in Toronto! [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 8:09 pm
When you're battling against a company like Dell or another giant corporation, the odds may be stacked against you even more. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
Blockbuster, Inc. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 8:27 am
"We're pleased to have it behind us and to move on," Dell spokesman David Frink said in a phone interview. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Effect of a stipulated dismissal: Garber v Chicago Mercantile Exchange and the Chicago Board of Trade (Patently-O) BPAI speaks on ‘transformation’ prong: Ex Parte Hardwick (12:01 Tuesday) ITC issues final determination of s 337 violation in investigation based on complaint lodged by Samsung against Sharp concerning LCD devices (ITC 337 Law Blog) ITC decides not to review enforcement initial determination that… [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 1:04 pm
So Dell is told, hey, this corporation's been in business for years, so we're now eligible to lease your product. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Dell, Slip Copy, 2008 WL 5351042 (E.D. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 9:15 am
Ergotron, Inc., 2:06cv00272 (E.D. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 11:45 pm
In re Mississippi Cheese Straw Factory, Inc., Application Serial No. 76617223 (March 3, 2009) [not precedential]The specimen was a website order form that Examining Attorney Allison Holtz found unacceptable because it did not show the mark "in close proximity to a picture of the goods. [read post]
