Search for: "IN RE GRAND JURY"
Results 161 - 180
of 2,540
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2011, 8:01 am
Yes, a Grand Jury commands the power to do so. [read post]
11 May 2014, 11:21 am
The District Attorney of Queens County is granted leave to re-present the charges to another Grand Jury, if he be so advised. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 2:24 pm
A New York Criminal Lawyer said that, the People now move this Court for re-argument and reinstatement of count six as originally charged by the grand jury. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:24 pm
A New York Criminal Lawyer said that, the People now move this Court for re-argument and reinstatement of count six as originally charged by the grand jury. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 1:32 pm
We’re tremendously delighted. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 1:43 pm
According to documents obtained by the Associated Press, Judge Beryl Howell ruled Friday that federal prosecutors investigating Donald Trump’s handling of classified documents can compel his lawyer to answer more questions before a grand jury. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 9:24 am
In the federal court case, of In Re Petition of Stanley Kutler, et al', filed by Stanley Kutler, Professor Emeritus at the University of Wisconsin, the American Historical Association, the American Society for Legal History, the Organization of American Historians,... [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 7:11 am
The Seventh Amendment states, in part, that “the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 5:39 am
In re Grand Jury Subpoena, supra. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 7:35 pm
Supreme Court to end grand jury case against her. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 4:47 am
” Are felons denied participation in our democratic system because they’re excluded from jury duty? [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 8:38 am
Penelope Pether, Villanova University School of Law, has published "Regarding the Miller Girls: Daisy, Judith, and the Seeming Paradox of in re Grand Jury Subpoena, Judith Miller," in 19 Law and Literature: The New Exceptionalism: Law and Literature Since 9/11 Symposium 187 (2007). [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:17 am
Div. 1997) (“If the Grand Jury does not return a true bill after re-presentment of the charges that are contained in the original indictment, the Grand Jury’s return of ‘no true bill’ creates a legal impediment to conviction of defendant requiring dismissal of the indictment. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:57 am
So sayeth the Ninth Circuit in In re: Grand Jury Subpoenas Served on White & Case LLP, Lieff, Cabraser, Heinemann, K&L Gates LLP, & Nossman, LLP, No. 10-15758, slip op. (9th Cir. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am
In In re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, the Eleventh Circuit released a published opinion and reversed a district court's order finding Doe in civil contempt. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am
In In re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, the Eleventh Circuit released a published opinion and reversed a district court's order finding Doe in civil contempt. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:31 pm
Oberly, III, United States Attorney for the District of Delaware, announced today that a federal grand jury has returned an indictment charging David Gellad, age 43, of Rosemere, Quebec, Canada, with traveling to the United States to engage in sexual conduct with a 14-year-old female whom he met online. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:31 pm
Oberly, III, United States Attorney for the District of Delaware, announced today that a federal grand jury has returned an indictment charging David Gellad, age 43, of Rosemere, Quebec, Canada, with traveling to the United States to engage in sexual conduct with a 14-year-old female whom he met online. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 10:20 pm
The Ninth Circuit found a Catch-22 for secret account holders in a case, In re Grand Jury Investigation M.H. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 7:20 pm
Refusing to talk to a grand jury without use immunity is a reasonable stance for someone to take even if she thinks she hasn’t done anything wrong—especially where, as here, the grand jury’s investigation appears to have political overtones. [read post]
