Search for: "IN RE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS"
Results 161 - 180
of 7,432
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2024, 2:44 pm
Public speeches by government officials condemning speech carried by online platforms might just be acceptable use of the bully pulpit. [read post]
The Implications of An ICJ Finding that Israel is Committing the Crime Against Humanity of Apartheid
20 Mar 2024, 5:55 am
These States might also consider re-establishing the U.N. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 7:02 am
But there are signs that this is not a conversation, at least not a public one, some officials want to have. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:24 am
I'm not sure and I doubt that the government could mandate those sorts of changes in enforcement or policy, but public officials can call for those changes. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:36 pm
Indeed, such suasion is is normal behavior for public officials. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:55 am
We’re in a race for lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, and other critical minerals needed to move away from fossil fuels. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am
Court decisions are public information — they’re authored by judges and issued publicly to tell us what the law is, and why. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:35 pm
Granted, Bay Area traffic is dreadful, but is easy enough to travel between these posts–even by public transit. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:39 am
Simply “liking” or re-tweeting official policy is less likely to be seen as an official act. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:16 am
Jaffer pointed to other issues including the Dobbs decision and the Israel-Hamas war where there have been speech-related controversies: “I worry whether we can cabin the rules [around jawboning] to [just] the public health context … it is especially important that government speech be subject to real checks and counterweights. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 12:35 pm
The changes have led some organizations to drop their opposition to the bill, but we still believe it is a dangerous and unconstitutional censorship bill that would empower state officials to target services and online content they do not like. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 12:30 pm
" If a town takes your property because it doesn't like you or what you're planning to build, but it says as a pretext that it'll leave the land as an empty field for a "passive park," is that bad-faith purpose still a "public use"? [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 6:24 am
One plaintiff, they note, was “censored” after she re-published a post by Robert F. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 4:01 am
§ 404(d), the OIG referred the false statements allegation to the Department for a prosecutive decision. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:46 pm
Classification rules for high-risk AI systems (Art. 6) High risk AI systems are those: used as a safety component or a product covered by EU laws in Annex II AND required to undergo a third-party conformity assessment under those Annex II laws; ORthose under Annex III use cases (below), except if: the AI system performs a narrow procedural task;improves the result of a previously completed human activity;detects decision-making patterns or deviations from prior … [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 5:50 am
In every generation, a crisis comes to a country that becomes a seminal global public event and engages our life’s work of advancing international law. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
While the Russian court decision against her was dated 24 November 2023, the text of the judgement was not made available until 12 December 2023. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm
Some legal terms used in our Minnesota criminal justice system are difficult for people to understand. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 3:53 pm
They're very big on the media photo ops. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:55 am
Green amendments can actually help defend against this litigation because the decision-making process required of state officials is more robust, van Rossum said. [read post]
