Search for: "IN RE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT FOR MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL EDUC"
Results 161 - 165
of 165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2009, 4:24 am
[Plaintiff] can hardly avoid violating this Kafkaesque rule. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:35 am
The settlement, approved by the federal court in Boise, Idaho on October 1, covers a range of violations beginning as early as 1991 and ending in 2009. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:35 am
The settlement, approved by the federal court in Boise, Idaho on October 1, covers a range of violations beginning as early as 1991 and ending in 2009. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:35 am
The settlement, approved by the federal court in Boise, Idaho on October 1, covers a range of violations beginning as early as 1991 and ending in 2009. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]
