Search for: "IN RE WYETH"
Results 161 - 180
of 699
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2013, 10:36 am
See Wyeth v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 3:04 pm
We were planning to write about the Bartlettoral argument today (we still might) when we learned about Howard v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
We’ve been pondering what to do with the latest 70+ page whopper from the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas for a couple of weeks. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 2:39 pm
Wyeth, 227 W.Va. 131 (W.Va. 2010). [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
Wyeth, 872 F. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
Wyeth, 168 Cal. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 12:53 pm
Wyeth, 74 Pa. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm
In re Schering Plough Corp. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 3:47 pm
Wyeth LLC, 872 F. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
Wyeth-Ayerst Labs., 385 F.3d 961, 966 (6th Cir. 2004) (holding that a drug manufacturer is immune from suit unless “the FDA itself determines that a fraud has been committed on the agency during the regulatory-approval process”) citing Buckman Co. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:58 am
Wyeth, Inc., 37 A.3d 549, 576 (N.J. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 12:52 pm
****************** The Blog's recent discussionof the recent In re Darvocet, Darvon & Propoxyphene Products Liability Litigation decision, which applied PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 7:22 am
Pisano, U.S.D.J., of the District of New Jersey has stayed several class-action litigations challenging the legality of certain reverse-payment settlement agreements between Wyeth and generic drug manufacturer Teva Pharmaceuticals, pursuant to which Wyeth allegedly paid Teva to delay its marketing of a generic counterpart to Wyeth’s Effexor XR drug. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 6:30 am
Wyeth Inc. and In re Lamictal Direct Purchaser Antitrust LitigationThe settlement agreements challenged in Professional Drug Co. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm
Wyeth, C.A. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:43 pm
We’re rather tired of the other side, abetted by the flawed reasoning in Desiano v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:09 pm
As we previously reported, the case, styled as In re Cipro Cases I & II, was initiated in late 2000 and is a proceeding of nine coordinated cases brought by indirect CIPRO purchasers. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 12:47 pm
At least they’re paying attention. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
Wyeth-Ayerst Labs., 585 F.3d 361 (6th Cir. 2004), and the bad one (wretched, awful, horrible, etc - we're tempted to unload the thesaurus on this one) is Desiano v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:25 pm
New Jersey’s high court said that the Gannons’ suit had to be dismissed to avoid re-litigating the case. [read post]
