Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF T. P., A CHILD"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2015, 11:33 am
But even so, when the child’s best interests aren’t jeopardized, a court may well take seriously a religious arbitration panel’s decision about whether a particular term of the ex-spouses’ childrearing agreement is being adhered to. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:06 pm
(p. 15.)The majority continued in this vein: "Casey ... confirms the State's interest in promoting respect for human life at all stages in the pregnancy. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 12:35 pm
” The court cares about the best interests of the children. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 12:03 pm
App.2d 522, 528, 920 P. 2d 450 (1996), defines as “no child, no matter how wealthy the parents, needs to be provided more than three ponies. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 7:35 pm
Reibel also had an interesting discussion about the use of a statutory maximum as a sentencing benchmark. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 9:57 am
If it doesn’t hurt, it doesn’t motivate a child to avoid the consequence next time. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 6:48 am
Because it didn't matter what the results of the dog sniff test, according to the officer himself. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:45 am
Exploitation and Abuse: The Scale and Scope of Human Trafficking in South Eastern Europe (UNODC, May 2022) [text] Mapping Rohingya Movement: Collected Data on the Trafficking Routes of a Persecuted Population (Freedom Collaborative, March 2022) [text] Modern Slavery and Migrant Smuggling: A Sustainable Development Conundrum, Working Paper, no. 13 (Jean Monnet Network on EU Law Enforcement, 2022) [text] Third-country national victims of trafficking in human beings: detection,… [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:54 am
In determining the appropriateness of the P! [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 4:32 pm
Here's one judge's answer, from today's ruling by Judge Michael P. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:33 am
As to child support, the answer is a definitive "no. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 8:44 am
B&P USA Inc., attractive nuisance isn’t a separate cause of action or theory of liability. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 8:44 am
B&P USA Inc., attractive nuisance isn’t a separate cause of action or theory of liability. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 5:45 am
An Interesting Case from Oklahoma I recently read a very interesting appellate opinion out of Oklahoma where the court held that the express exclusion of one child does not prevent unmentioned children from taking as pretermitted children. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:54 am
By Joy P. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 10:52 am
“We decided we would just use child slang for it. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 8:30 am
In that sense, it is interesting to consider what might have been. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:57 am
For other bloggers of interest, see the various posts on the Volokh Conspiracy and the New York Times's Room for Debate blog. [read post]
19 May 2008, 5:42 pm
(I sure hope not)If you want to feel good about the Williams ruling...BREAKING -- Court Upholds Child Porn Law 7-2Brief Guide to the First Amendment and Sexually Themed Speech (this is a nice background post by Volokh in addition to the substantive one I linked to above)Court Upholds Law That Prohibits Promotion of Child PornographySupreme Court Upholds Child P*orn Law [read post]
7 May 2007, 10:59 am
An order issued in a probate proceeding begun after the death of the participant that purports to recognize an interest with respect to pension benefits arising solely under state community property law, but that doesn't relate to the dissolution of a marriage or recognition of support obligations, is not a QDRO because the proceeding does not relate to a legal separation, marital dissolution, or family support obligation. [read post]
