Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF JOHN CARTER" Results 161 - 180 of 521
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm by David Kris
At one level, of course, this is not surprising—John Bellinger identified Donald Trump as a potential danger to U.S. national security in 2015, and Benjamin Wittes followed up in 2016 and 2017. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
Maddox had served as mayor, while Carter-Smith was his chief of staff and business partner. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 5:00 am by Sarah Grant, Chuck Rosenberg
Time to let more than [Clinton Campaign chairman John Podesta] be exposed [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:03 am by Hilary Hurd, Elena Chachko
Shortly after the president’s statement, national security adviser John Bolton traveled to Moscow to discuss Russia’s violations and the prospect of a U.S. withdrawal. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 10:42 am by Ronald Collins
Question: As a historical matter, how does the Supreme Court’s 7-1 ruling in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 8:25 am by Anushka Limaye
.: The Brookings Institution’s John L. [read post]
8 Sep 2018, 8:02 am by William Ford
Jurecic shared the first of the two features, Kavanaugh vs. the Committee With No Bull, Part 1: And Kahn posted Part 2: Following the fourth day of hearings, Kahn also posted Rebecca Ingber’s testimony on Kavanaugh’s approach to executive deference on matters related to national security and international law, as well as former White House Counsel John Dean’s testimony on executive power. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 3:00 am by Victoria Clark
The event will include the launch of a new CSIS report by Jen Daskal and William Carter, keynote remarks by Sen. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 5:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
First of all, though the Second Circuit is an important appellate court, its decisions do not control in other Circuits (or for that matter, in any state court). [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 5:34 am by John Eastman
Although Chief Justice John Roberts, who wrote the majority opinion, and Justice Anthony Kennedy, who wrote a concurrence, clearly offered no quarter to those prior statements, the proclamation was itself facially neutral and bona fide, and that ended the matter. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:18 am by Hilary Hurd, Yishai Schwartz
Historical practice confirms this: Past executive orders (by President Jimmy Carter in 1979 and President Ronald Reagan in 1986) also suspended entry to aliens based on nationality. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
…” [17] Another matter that needs to be addressed at the hearing is how to serve an injunction on the unknown defendant. [read post]
3 May 2018, 1:50 pm by David Kris
John Linder in January 2000—sometimes referred to as the “Linder Letter”— the Justice Department decided to “take this opportunity to present . . . for the benefit of both Members of Congress and the public at large . . . the Department's longstanding positions and practices on responding to congressional oversight requests. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:32 am by Scott Bomboy
President Jimmy Carter also gave sworn testimony in three situations during his one term in office. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:15 pm by Steve Vladeck, Benjamin Wittes
In the course of reviewing the relevant precedents, Justice John Paul Stevens offered the following observations: it is ... [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 12:30 pm by Whitney Jones Roy and Whitney Hodges
On remand from the Supreme Court, the decision analyzes which entity is permitted to decide this matter after the Supreme Court rejected an earlier circuit decision supporting the ban. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 12:30 pm by Whitney Jones Roy and Whitney Hodges
On remand from the Supreme Court, the decision analyzes which entity is permitted to decide this matter after the Supreme Court rejected an earlier circuit decision supporting the ban. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 2:01 pm by William Ford
John McCain remain undecided on her nomination. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In explaining the absence of any legitimate public interest in such subject-matter, the Judge stated: “it would only be a matter of prurient gossip, which it is possible that the Defendant and others would be able to turn to financial advantage, but that is naturally quite a different matter from genuine public interest. [read post]