Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE A GRAND JURY."
Results 161 - 180
of 989
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2020, 1:19 pm
Grand jury proceedings are secret, and the Manhattan District Attorney has refused to say whether the President himself is a target of the investigation. [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 2:15 pm
After this discussion between attorney and client, the defendant stated he did not wish to testify before the grand jury." [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 2:11 pm
That resolution, among other things, authorized the Judiciary Committee to “initiate or intervene in any judicial proceeding before a federal court” to (1) enforce subpoenas issued to Attorney General Bill Barr and former White House Counsel Don McGahn; and (2) petition the court for disclosure of grand jury material related to the Mueller report (a topic one of us wrote about with Mikhaila Fogel shortly before the Mueller report was… [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:49 pm
On the other hand, if the Court concludes that potential liability for grand jury testimony may impair the day-to-day functioning of grand juries, and that there are practical differences between grand juries and warrant proceedings, then it could extend Briscoe’s rule of absolute immunity. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 3:19 am
First of all, grand jury proceedings are secret. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 10:53 am
For instance, if you refuse to testify before a grand jury you will be put in jail until that grand jury is no longer sitting. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 5:13 am
But the intent behind the "grand jury report" was clear. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm
In the 1993 Nixon case, Judge Nixon was a US District Judge in Mississippi who had been criminally convicted of making false statements before a federal grand jury and sentenced to prison. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am
The resolutions authorizing both the Nixon and Clinton impeachment proceedings granted the judiciary committee this authority. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 1:36 pm
Before any of these charges were brought against the defendant, the Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department began an investigation into several of these matters, which later became the subject of some of the criminal charges she is facing. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:58 am
For me, that line of questioning is civil procedure, and more specifically, judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”). [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 8:06 am
” Moreover, the court placed considerable weight on the fact that even if Vance did obtain the tax returns, members of Congress would be unable to view them since New York law makes the unauthorized disclosure of grand jury proceedings a felony. [read post]
9 May 2019, 3:19 pm
On May 2, Barr declined to appear for a scheduled hearing before the committee. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 4:40 pm
The proceedings before the grand inquest is not a trial. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 5:17 am
Specifically, he argues that, as a matter of law, the Commonwealth failed to prove that the value of the item stolen was $200 or more, and therefore, his conviction of grand larceny should be reversed and remanded for further proceedings. . . .Williams v. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 3:16 pm
Defendant was well aware that BL had given a signed statement on July 9, 1975, nearly three weeks before she was subpoenaed to appear before the Grand Jury, in which she stated that she had spoken with Mrs. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:58 am
Citing the Fifth Amendment, all 14 are refusing to testify before the grand jury, which they say is a secretive arm of a government intent on silencing critics. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 1:41 pm
The trial date of October 14, 1983 was set to be final date where the matter would be brought before a grand jury or there would be a dismissal of the case against the defendant. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 2:45 pm
A Lawyer said that, immediately before trial, the Trial Justice conducted a hearing. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 3:04 pm
A further rationale for the thesis that an indictment returned by a grand jury for a crime involving spouses, Before the matter had been considered by the Family Court, is a total nullity. [read post]
