Search for: "Icon Health & Fitness" Results 161 - 180 of 330
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2015, 7:14 am by Gene Quinn
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., was the primary decision simply because that case was treated first by the Court and formed the basis of the Court’s decision in Highmark, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2014, 11:36 am by Daniel Nazer
Icon Health and Fitness, the court made it easier for defendants that win patent cases to get their attorney’s fees paid by the patent holder. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 9:13 pm
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., the Supreme Court also rejected the “rigid” two-part Brooks Furniture test, holding that “an ‘exceptional’ case [warranting attorney fees] is simply one that stands out from others with respect to the substantive strength of a party’s litigating position . . . or the unreasonable manner in which the case was litigated. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 9:23 am by Dennis Crouch
Icon Health & Fitness (attorney fee awards in exceptional cases); and Medtronic v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 9:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Confusion is particularly amenable to jury resolution, and the jury was instructed that it could weigh the factors as it saw fit. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 7:08 am by Docket Navigator
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S.Ct. 1749 (April 29, 2014), the court granted plaintiff's motion to reconsider an earlier order denying plaintiff's motion for attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 11:34 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S.Ct. 1749 (2014) and Highmark, Inc. v. [read post]