Search for: "Idaho v. Doe" Results 161 - 180 of 921
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
 Neither does the status of the owner (living v. not living). [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
Nor does the policy as applied violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which does not apply to the state’s disparate treatment of its own political subdivisions....Strikes me as quite correct, given Ysursa v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 6:20 pm
' BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY 953 (8th ed. 2004); see also Levine v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 1:47 pm by Tom Smith
As anybody with an elementary understanding of American law comprehends, one does not need to call an Article V convention in order to effectively remove a provision from the Constitution. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
 (This number does not account for all voters who were purged in the Supplemental Process.) [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:45 pm by Amy Howe
Shortly after the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]