Search for: "Identification Devices v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 350
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2015, 1:59 pm
See, e.g., Murphy v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 1:28 pm
In a rare address from the Oval Office yesterday evenin, President Barack Obama discussed the administration’s response to the rising threat of domestic terrorism in the United States following last Wednesday’s shooting in San Bernardino. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 3:23 pm
It can be any word, symbol, name or device or any combination thereof used by a person other than its owner or one where the owner of the mark maintains a bona fide intent to permit others to use the mark in commerce and the owner registers the mark on the Principal Register at the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:26 am
” entries refer to sections of the United States Sentencing Commission Guidelines Manual, which you can find here, and which sets out the factors and standards that factor into federal sentencing. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 8:42 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has just published its appellate opinion in the Google Books case.Early last year I wrote that I had initially been rather skeptical of Google's "fair use" argument relating to Google Books, but ultimately I found myself in agreement with Google. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:53 am
The denial of review in United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 3:50 am
State v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 12:45 pm
United States (466 U.S. 170, 182-83 (1984)) may also be difficult. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:28 am
For that reason, well-known cases like United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 5:54 am
United Airlines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471, (1999) and Murphy v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 1:22 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
Rule 16(a)(6) is a catchall clause that requires the government to “[a]dvise the defendant’s attorney of evidence favorable to the defendant and material to the defendant’s guilt or punishment to which defendant is entitled pursuant to Brady and United States v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
Recently, Bexis attended the DRI drug and device committee spring conference. [read post]
19 May 2015, 8:45 am
But see United We Stand Am., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:20 am
’ In re Application of the United States for Historical Cell Site Data, supra. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:10 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 9:26 pm
The Supreme Court recently observed this challenge to patent claim interpretation, stating in Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:35 am
See United States v. [read post]
