Search for: "In Interest of Ec"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2009, 3:36 am
Related posts:Italian Conference on the Rome I Reg.: “La nuova disciplina comunitaria della legge applicabile alle obbligazioni contrattuali” A very interesting conference on the Rome I Regulation will... [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 5:25 am
The report sets out the findings of the EC's sector commission inquiry into business insurance which was initiated in June 2005. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 10:57 am
But, whatever ultimately happens in the ECJ appeal of the EC's state aid decision regarding Apple and Ireland, I would be surprised if this set of arguments ended up cutting much ice. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 7:04 pm
Directive n. 2003/49/EC of June 3, 2003 on payments of intra-European Union interest and royalties. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 5:08 am
Katfriend Valentina Torelli pointed us to an interesting decision from Germany. [read post]
19 May 2017, 4:30 am
This will insure consistency and avoid times when there are conflicts of interest. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:48 pm
This is an interesting little case as it deals with the issue of adequate notice in respect of web-hosting immunity available under the Electronic Commerce (EC Directive) Regulations 2002 (“the 2002 Regulations”). [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:45 am
This is from the EU first written submission in the Philippines - Distilled Spirits case (DS396 for the EC case, DS403 for the parallel U.S. complaint): 105. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:45 am
This is from the EU first written submission in the Philippines - Distilled Spirits case (DS396 for the EC case, DS403 for the parallel U.S. complaint): 105. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 12:42 pm
It is these principles coming from the EC Directive and which will combine with remedies and provisions of the 1994 Act which need to be adopted for the development of effective legislation in the areas of Commercial Practice Guyana, which will also need to cover patents and copyright infringement. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 5:05 pm
The so-called ‘right to be forgotten’, is of particular current interest: its mooted inclusion in the forthcoming revision of the Data Protection Directive (Directive 95/46/EC) has produced much debate and comment, some of it extremely negative, some emotional and some displaying both ignorance and misunderstanding. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:44 am
New law being implemented in March as part of an EC Directive, will require internet service providers (ISPs) to keep information about every e-mail sent or received by every person in the UK for a period 12 months. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 7:31 am
” These are interesting comments, although I’m not sure how well the “made known” requirement would translate from the application side of the Canadian trade mark system to the renewal side of the European system, since a mark is constructively made known to the entire EC as soon as it is placed on the register. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 1:21 am
On Regulation (EC) no 2201/2003, art. 20 Among ECJ decisions on Regulation (EC) no. 2201/03, there are... [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 5:23 am
The European Court of Justice decided an interesting case last week (Case C-386/08, Brita, 25 February 2010). [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 11:38 am
My ruminations over an interesting ECJ ruling of 11 December 2008, which might open new perspectives in the area of exploitative abuses: In Kanal 5 Ltd, TV 4 AB v (STIM) upa, C-52/07, the ECJ had to determine whether (i) the royalties charged by the swedish collecting society to broadcast companies were excessively high, hence abusive under Article 82 (a) EC ; and (ii) whether the different fee formula applicable on the one hand, to a public broadcast company and, on the… [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 10:05 am
At the same time, the current AS investigation includes a lot of interesting aspects on the technical side, which make the case attractive to watch for the trade defense measures afficionados. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 10:05 am
At the same time, the current AS investigation includes a lot of interesting aspects on the technical side, which make the case attractive to watch for the trade defense measures afficionados. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 9:19 am
Sinco's application was therefore dismissed.This case raises some interesting and significant issues in relation to jurisdiction for parties in Member States subject to the EC Regulation. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 6:14 pm
While this case will be of interest to those who deal with the decreasing numbers who might be caught up in a similar factual situation, it is also very interesting to compare the two different approaches to proportionality, see [31]-[44] & [63]-[65] on the one hand and [48]-[59] & [68]-[69] on the other. [read post]
