Search for: "In Re: Amendments to Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to The Bar"
Results 161 - 180
of 244
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, AGENCY FOR WORKFORCE INNOVATION and POINT BREAK SURVEYING, LLC, Appellees. 1st District.Attorney's fees -- Claim or defense not supported by material facts or applicable law -- Loan agreement -- In action on claim of personal loan that was poorly documented and never repaid by defendants who claim it was a gift, trial court abused discretion in awarding attorney's fees against plaintiff and her attorney based on defendant's claim that… [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 3:38 am
You’re representing a defendant who was involved in a bar fight that went seriously bad. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 12:14 pm
Raveendran Supreme Court of India The Supreme Court in Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
For example, in the case of In re: Lopez, No. 09-10346, 2011 WL 576820 (Bankr. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:16 pm
Blog post-US Supreme Court Bankruptcy Watch: Readying for Stern v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:35 pm
In contrast to the common law rule, the more recently developed right of access to court records grounded in the First Amendment derives from the United States Supreme Court’s recognition of a First Amendment right to open trials, and has generally been limited to official court records of adjudicatory proceedings....We also disagree with the trial court’s conclusion that the First Amendment right of access… [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
Whether the results derived from the impugned techniques amount to `testimonial compulsion' thereby attracting the bar of Article 20(3)? [read post]
8 May 2011, 7:01 pm
In re: People v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
But when the California Supreme Court took a look at Kearl and the case-by-case approach to comment k, the court recoiled. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
-EU Extradition and Mutual Legal Assistance Agreements and the other related bilateral instruments between the United States and European Union Member States. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
(IP Dragon) DuPont learns that global IP theft doesn’t stop at the border (China Hearsay) Europe The chocolate menagerie: General Court decides on bunny, reindeer and mouse shapes: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v OHIM (jiplp) ECJ rules on legislative limitations on copyright protection for designs in Europe: Flos SpA v Semeraro Casa e Famiglia SpA (jiplp) AG delivers opinion in Viking Gas A/S v BP Gas A/S concerning trade mark law and refilling of gas bottles… [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm
Such a review is ordered in every murder case by the state Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:59 pm
Sandoval: The Court found that in light of the United States Supreme Court decision in Padilla v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
Hernandez-Guerrero’s re-entry date. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 6:35 pm
Baez also contended that the trial court should have allowed him to represent himself, but the supreme court rejected this claim also, ruling that defendant did, eventually, accept the representation of appointed counsel. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
ShackelfordDocket: 10-589Issue(s): (1) Whether the Idaho Supreme Court erred in concluding that errors under Ring v. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 5:53 pm
Res Judicata is related to the public policy against “claim splitting” which may bar a subsequent claim “if a Plaintiff was able to present it, in its entirety, in the prior forum. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am
Maryland holding that the Eighth Amendment erects a per se bar against a victim's family members' characterizations and opinions about the crime, defendant, and appropriate sentence; and (2) to the extent that any part of Booth survives, whether it applies to a sentencing proceeding in which death is not option.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (Supreme Court of Utah)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of the National Crime… [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
New York State courts had already ruled and a foreclosure judgment was issued, so now U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 6:08 pm
And you thought the Supreme Court could never be exciting. [read post]
