Search for: "In Re: Appointment to Criminal Procedure Rules Committee"
Results 161 - 180
of 254
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2014, 8:33 pm
At the time of the announcement of her appoint, Ms. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
A rough categorization that may be helpful is those cases not enumerated under 469 of the Criminal Code. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
A rough categorization that may be helpful is those cases not enumerated under 469 of the Criminal Code. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 1:27 pm
However, we are deeply concerned about the changes that the House Rules Committee made to the bill prior to passage, which substantially weakened the version of the bill that had passed with unanimous support from both the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:55 am
Last Action: 6/3/2014 PLACED ON ORDER OF THIRD READING WITH SUBSTITUTE S-3 • SB 0796 of 2014 Criminal procedure; sentencing guidelines; sentencing guidelines for prohibited species violations; enact. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 4:33 pm
The cert petition summarizes the law (citations omitted): As a state agency, the Board has traditional governmental powers that private actors typically do not have: It has quasi-legislative power “to enact rules and regulations governing the practice of dentistry,” backed by criminal penalties. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:30 am
” It was mainly the Uniform Evidence Act with some re-organization and re-drafting. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:30 am
Despite my misgivings, I was drawn in to read more: “Scott Lonnigan treats his appointment to the Grievance Committee in San Antonio, Texas just the same as his job as a criminal defense lawyer: with deadly seriousness. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 8:13 pm
In anticipation of these activities, these and other employers may want to participate in one of the following “introductory webinars” on the new rules this week (with repeats in September) to provide overviews of the key points of the rules OFCCP Webinars on the VEVRAA Final Rule on August 29, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 6:52 pm
Employer and union group health plan sponsors and insurers of group and individual health plans (Health Plans) agonizing over 2014 plan design decisions are running out of time. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 10:00 pm
As well, as pointed out by Professor Ogilvie, procedure was becoming more technical. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:16 am
The SCOV, in recognition that the “rules currently do not prescribe any procedure for addressing such claims of ineffective assistance,” referred the matter to the Advisory Committee on Rules for Family Proceedings for the proposal of “a rule that best ensures finality and timely resolution of [termination] claims consistent with parents’ legal rights. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 8:03 pm
Trade Union Law imposed criminal and administrative law liability on companies who prevent the operation of labor union. 3. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:00 am
In re Territo (a Ninth Circuit decision) applied that rule in affirming that it was perfectly lawful to hold Territo as a POW, and Ex parte Quirin (a Supreme Court decision) not only said the same but also approved prosecution by military commission for both the citizens and non-citizens among the captured German saboteurs. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:45 am
Legislation had previously been passed, particularly in 2000, by the Pitcairn government (which actually has its administrative offices in Auckland, NZ) and the UK government to establish the different levels of courts, appeal processes, and various procedural rules. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 12:12 pm
Although that section provides an alternative method of discipline, nothing in the rules limits the Committee to that procedure. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
Former Pentagon General Counsel Jeh Johnson is, at this hour, giving this speech at Fordham Law School in New York: Keynote address at the Center on National Security at Fordham Law School: A “Drone Court”: Some Pros and Cons by Jeh Charles Johnson[1] March 18, 2013 [preliminary extemporaneous remarks] Thank you for this invitation. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am
United States12-705Issue: Whether, when considering how much to reduce a defendant’s sentence for substantial assistance pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b), a court (i) cannot consider the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:55 am
The Jan. 9th announcement marks the beginning of criminal prosecution against Mr. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm
§ 2254(d), that a defendant retains a constitutional right to revoke his prior waiver of counsel at trial and require re-appointment of counsel to file a new-trial motion. [read post]
