Search for: "In Re: I I Corporation, a Corporation"
Results 161 - 180
of 17,994
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2016, 7:49 pm
See In Re Investors Bancorp, Inc. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 7:31 am
In order to illustrate this struggle, and the changed analytical valency of race, I will trace the attempt made in the 1970’s, by the ‘Group of 77’ states, to assert international legal control over trans or multi-national corporations, and the contemporaneous response by the West, which prefigured the transformation of the initiative after the end of the Cold War. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 8:29 am
Here at Credit Slips, we're into the bird's eye view. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 5:32 am
The Formalities of Running a Corporation Whether you’re a one man shop or a multi-national conglomerate, some formalities simply can’t be ignored. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm
In re Clovis Oncology provides another notable example. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 3:21 am
In Re/Max, no mention is made of the company’s tax returns or K-1s, most likely indicating that the company never made an S-Corp election. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 11:32 am
Q: Do I need to incorporate twice? [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 6:42 am
If you are a reader of this blog, you will remember that I wrote about that decision last April. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 10:56 am
Anthony Paonita, editor-in-chief of Corporate Counsel magazine, and I are organizing a panel for LegalTech New York that should be a flat-out blast. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 1:45 am
I'm not sure I buy this. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:13 am
“I was taking a real estate course and the instructor brought up the idea of having an s-corporation. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 9:52 am
(And if you're ever thinking of writing a book yourself, let me know, as I've got a whole lot of advice to offer on this topic now too.) [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 11:40 am
My first book, Essentials of Corporate Fraud is done. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 3:00 pm
Anthony Paonita, editor-in-chief of Corporate Counsel magazine, and I are organizing the panel, and it should be a flat-out blast. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 8:31 pm
I write separately for the sole purpose of emphasizing the narrowness of this Court’s disposition with respect to the implications of Kiobel v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 5:22 am
Even if that explanation is correct, I wonder whether we're better off.... [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 5:18 am
I’m going to refer to all of these, generically, as Corporations. [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 6:24 pm
See In re Oxbow Carbon, LLC Unitholder Litigation, C.A. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 2:27 pm
When they're used in relatively more equal power relationships, they're no good because corporations can't game the system to their advantage. [read post]
1 May 2008, 3:58 pm
Recently, I blogged about a case brought in the US District Court, Southern District of Texas, by Apache Corporation, who sought a declaratory judgment supporting its exclusion of a shareholder proposal submitted by the New York City Employees’ Retirement System. [read post]
