Search for: "In Re: Rules Governing Professional Conduct" Results 161 - 180 of 1,949
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2013, 1:33 pm by Biersdorf & Associates
  Before accepting the government’s offer, seek professional assistance for advice on your potential eminent domain claim. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
I am thankful to my friend Eugene White for drawing to my attention a recent case from the ACT where a solicitor, David Landers, had some difficulties in dealing with ACT authorities on behalf of his client, a teacher who wanted to retire and get a payout due to illness.Because of the significance of this decision, I have set out the judgment in full.DAVID LANDER v COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY[2009] ACTSC 117 (11 September 2009)APPEAL - Appeal against finding of the… [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:25 am by SHG
But does that apply to professionals, where the testing of educational and experiential requirements serve to provide some modicum of assurance that these people know what they’re doing? [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 2:31 am by SHG
This Court was confronted with so many motions challenging the Government’s conduct that it was difficult to step back and look into whether what was going on reflected not isolated acts but a pattern of invidious conduct. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:56 pm by Patricia Hughes
We’re in the midst of a medical emergency — and we’re in the midst of a legal emergency. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
McKercher, the Supreme Court said that “[t]he purpose of law society regulation is to establish general rules applicable to all members to ensure ethical conduct, protect the public and discipline lawyers who breach the rules — in short, the good governance of the profession”. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 6:04 pm by Sophia Cope
The last significant ruling on device privacy at the border in the Ninth Circuit, whose rulings apply to nine western states, was in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 10:39 am
Thus, the Cohen court strongly implied that, even if admissible, testimony with less than a reasonable degree of medical certainty was insufficient to prove causation.As part of the burden of proof, then, Pennsylvania's rule is a substantive one, not in conflict with Federal Rules of Evidence, and thus governs in federal court.In re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB Litigation, 35 F.3d 717, 751-52 (3d Cir. 1994) [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 10:33 pm by Cookson Beecher
Speaking as a certified professional horticulturist and not as an OSU re [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 3:56 pm by Lovechilde
Framing everything as a standard-issue partisan fight is almost a professional imperative for many journalists." [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:16 am by Russ
Attorneys, certified public accountants, and enrolled agents have had to obtain a PTIN from the IRS Office of Professional Responsibility and to adhere to that office’s standards of competency and conduct. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:43 pm by Eugene Volokh
This principle could easily apply to, for instance, speech about educational policies, proper rules governing sexual relationships, and “social justice. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 7:27 pm by Kalvis Golde
But at the same time, the court of appeals explained, the Supreme Court made clear that there are exceptions to that rule – such as the situation here, when the state is regulating professional conduct that also involves speech. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 10:52 am by Mack Sperling
The Rules which govern attorney conduct apply to anyone appearing on a pro se basis. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 9:44 am by Michael Lowe
In George Orwell’s classic novel 1984, Oceania was ruled by a character called “Big Brother,” who oversaw the ruling government that held total control over the citizens “for its own sake. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 5:00 am by John Jascob
By Lene Powell, J.D.A group of commodity customers asked the Supreme Court to decide whether their professional negligence claims against PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) were improperly barred on the basis of in pari delicto, as the Second Circuit ruled. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 11:22 pm by Jeff Gamso
” “‘Where a statute authorizes the inspection but makes no rules governing the procedures that inspectors must follow, the Fourth Amendment and its various restrictive rules apply. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 6:16 am by Florian Mueller
And the court specifically declined to analyze Apple's challenged conduct under antitrust law.The rule changes that the Paris Commercial Court expects Apple to make relate to app review and to appeals of app rejections, but also to Apple's unilateral right to change the terms of the Developer Program License Agreement (DPLA) anytime. [read post]