Search for: "In Re Am Intern., Inc. Securities Litigation" Results 161 - 180 of 182
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:15 am by Allan Blutstein
[s]o they do not internalize the costs of a wild goose chase like this one. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:11 am by Mandelman
(NOTE TO THE READER: If that last sentence made any sense at all to you, please go back and re-read it.) [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
 Elsewhere, the Court of Justice of the European Union has defined, re-defined and refined its own and (perhaps) our understanding of what the right of 'communication to the public' under Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive actually is. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:33 am
GTE Sylvania, Inc., 447 U.S. 102, 108 (1980). [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Court: U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 11-9500 September 20, 2011 Judge: Hartz Areas of Law: Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Immigration Law, International Law Israeli citizens Arturas Bakanovas, Edita Bakanovas, and their daughter, Karolina Bakanovas, sought review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that denied their motion to reopen. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 5:22 pm by Bill Marler
During this time, FDA launched an investigation of the Bolthouse Farms, Inc., manufacturing plant in Bakersfield, California. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 9:40 pm by Sam E. Antar
  When you read this stuff you're saying five years from now, you're going to cringe in embarrassment like the rest of us are doing as we speak. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm by Francis Pileggi
  Instead, this list highlights notable decisions that should be of widespread interest to those who work in the corporate and commercial litigation field or who follow the latest developments in this area of Delaware law. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
I am not involved in the case.] [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[71] Justice Arbour noted that, in explaining the standard to a jury, it might be preferable to re-word the standard of causation using positive terms, for example, a phrase such as a “‘significant contributing cause’ rather than using expressions phrased in the negative such as ‘not a trivial cause’ or ‘not insignificant’. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by Devlin Hartline
I can lock it up forever or loan it to everyone else in the world but him without any liability since I am under no duty of noninterference with respect to the would-be fair user. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:30 pm by Satya Marar
If efficiency is the goal of antitrust, then why am I charged by statute with stopping unfair methods of competition, and not “inefficient” ones? [read post]