Search for: "In Re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure" Results 161 - 180 of 310
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2014, 5:40 am
District Court Judge’s “denial of his Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 29 motion for a judgment of acquittal”, an issue we will return to later. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:29 pm by APransky
So, say you're accused of running a scam from your house in Florida over the internet. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 5:38 am by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
      However, the problem with the opt out procedure under the OVDP rules insofar as reducing the FBAR penalty is that the IRS intended the opt-out procedure  to apply only to “a discrete minority” of cases. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:46 am
 According to Kennedy, Florida’s rule violates the Eighth Amendment prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 6:41 am
Epstein’s attorneys intervened, arguing that Federal Rule of Evidence 410 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 create a privilege for plea negotiations, barring release of the correspondence. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:34 am by Law Lady
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 5th District.Criminal law -- Habeas corpus -- Malice murder -- District court properly denied relief on claim that state trial court's jury instructions on venue, an essential element of crime charged, improperly shifted burden of proof to petitioner and claim that state trial court's 25-year delay in resolving petitioner's motion for new trial violated his due process rights under Fourteenth Amendment -- Venue is essential element of Georgia offense of… [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am by John Elwood
Powell rule that Fourth Amendment claims aren’t cognizable on habeas). [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm by Ken White
John Steele, Paul Duffy, and Prenda law filed defamation suits simultaneously against Alan Cooper and his lawyer Paul Godfread in Illinois and Florida in retaliation for them revealing that Prenda had stolen Alan Cooper's identity. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm by Law Lady
S A FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL, LLC, a foreign limited liability company, d/b/a OEC LATIN AMERICA, Appellee. 3rd District.Civil procedure -- Dismissal -- Failure to prosecute -- Error to grant motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution where movant did not provide required sixty-day notice required by revised rule and neither movant nor trial court recognized three instances of record activity preceding dismissal -- Any filing of record during applicable time frame is sufficient… [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Douglas 13-191Issue: Whether the Due Process Clause is violated by the Florida Supreme Court’s new rule of preclusion, which permits Engle v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:34 pm by James R. Marsh
Criminal law and procedure courses in law school have traditionally focused almost exclusively on the rights of defendants and the government’s awesome power to prosecute. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:34 pm by James R. Marsh
Criminal law and procedure courses in law school have traditionally focused almost exclusively on the rights of defendants and the government’s awesome power to prosecute. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:34 pm by James R. Marsh
Criminal law and procedure courses in law school have traditionally focused almost exclusively on the rights of defendants and the government’s awesome power to prosecute. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 1:45 pm by Orin Kerr
Today the Fifth Circuit issued its opinion, which is available here: In Re: Application of the United States of America for Historical Cell Site Data. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:00 am by Robert Chesney
 In re Territo (a Ninth Circuit decision) applied that rule in affirming that it was perfectly lawful to hold Territo as a POW, and Ex parte Quirin (a Supreme Court decision) not only said the same but also approved prosecution by military commission for both the citizens and non-citizens among the captured German saboteurs. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 10:47 am by Cicely Wilson
The Court looked to the “totality of circumstances,” declining to announce a per se rule. [read post]