Search for: "In Re Application for Order Enforcing a Subpoena" Results 161 - 180 of 341
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Liz Kramer
  This article will run through some "Do Re Mi's" of arbitration law, as articulated by those decisions (and will close with some arbitration cases on SCOTUS’s docket).In most circuits, arbitrators cannot subpoena documents in advance of an in-person hearing. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 2:38 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In Patriarch, the district court held that subpoenas and a formal investigative order issued by the U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In order to be considered a security, an offering must meet all four prongs. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am by Lorene Park
Trump) challenging the administration’s rescission of the DACA program, the failure to give adequate notice to DACA recipients of new deadlines, and the policy change on the use of DACA application information for immigration enforcement. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 10:00 am by Kendall Howell
The Eleventh Circuit in In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena (U.S. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 8:00 am by Orin Kerr
The government serves subpoenas on the providers, who then respond to the subpoenas. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:00 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
If an employer refuses to comply with an administrative subpoena, however, then immigration officials can only enforce it if they persuade a federal judge to issue a judicial order. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 3:05 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
If an employer refuses to comply with an administrative subpoena, however, then immigration officials can only enforce it if they persuade a federal judge to issue a judicial order. [read post]
Employers are also prohibited from allowing an immigration enforcement agent to access, review, or obtain most employee records without a subpoena or judicial warrant. [read post]
 AB 450, the “Immigrant Worker Protection Act,” prohibits employers from allowing immigration enforcement agents to have access to non-public areas of a workplace, absent a judicial warrant, and prohibits immigration enforcement agents to access, review, or obtain employee records without a subpoena or court order, subject to a specified exception. [read post]
 AB 450, the “Immigrant Worker Protection Act,” prohibits employers from allowing immigration enforcement agents to have access to non-public areas of a workplace, absent a judicial warrant, and prohibits immigration enforcement agents to access, review, or obtain employee records without a subpoena or court order, subject to a specified exception. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 7:08 am by David LaBahn
In In re United States for an Order Directing Provider of Elec. [read post]
The re-examination was also propelled by a 2015 EEOC ruling, in which it held, as a matter of agency interpretation, that discrimination against a man because he was gay constituted a form of actionable sex discrimination. [read post]