Search for: "In Re Blake V." Results 161 - 180 of 301
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2009, 3:39 am
  The Supreme Court doesn’t seem to be of a mind to re-examine the issue; last June, it rejected cert in Baylor’s case. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:41 am
Consider just the following, taken from the oral argument by the attorney for the appellants (Bishop vonRosenberg's group and ECUSA), Blake Hewitt. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 8:49 am
" Read more about the Burton appeal here in The National Appellate Journal, which writes that Burton asks: the Supreme Court the following questions: (1) Is the holding in Blakely v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 1:25 pm by Terry Lenamon
 They have only been exacerbated by continuing judicial expansion of the constitutional right to counsel for the indigent defendant, e.g., to include juveniles (In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 1967); those charged with misdemeanor crimes that carry jail sentences (Argersinger v. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am by Tobias Thienel
United Kingdom and previously held to be correct as a matter of international law by a number of American and English judges (Siderman de Blake v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 5:51 pm
Supreme Court In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Cramer For Pete's sake! [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 4:11 am by Russ Bensing
New Jersey and Blakely v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:22 pm
 No report yet from Judges Blake and Slom about this heavy and hot handed ill advised custom. [read post]