Search for: "In Re Blake V."
Results 161 - 180
of 301
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2012, 3:43 am
Appellate tip for the day: if you’re doing this sort of work, you’re arguing error, and if you’re arguing error, you’ve got to point the court in the right direction. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:40 am
By Eric Goldman Erickson v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 10:59 am
Exiting bankruptcy in January, CEO and Chairman Harsha V. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
v=NsJHqstPuNo UPDATE: Governor Branstad signed the bill into law. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 10:19 am
I refer, of course, to Blakely v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 9:30 am
Woods v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
Res. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 7:29 am
R(Pelling) v Newham LBC [2011] EWHC 3265 (Admin), 28.10.2011 (not on Bailii yet)It’s fair to say that I have an unnatural (purely) academic interest in high hedges – my colleagues laugh every time I try to discuss it sensibly. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 8:36 pm
In Public Agency Compensation Trust v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:04 am
And we’re supposed to be OK with that? [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 5:05 pm
Conclusion The Crookes v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 9:59 pm
Some Blake. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 10:01 am
At one point, Justice Breyer observed, “I worry we’re in an arcane area of the law. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:29 pm
Judulang v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:43 am
Back in 1983, in US v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 4:53 am
The 7th Circuit affirmed, discussing at length the difference between elements and sentencing factors, and the Supreme Court could decide that the case is the appropriate vehicle to re-examine the Apprendi/Blakely line. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:49 am
Take a look at State v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:36 am
Hudson, Blake. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 12:25 pm
Cyprus AMAX Minerals Co., 149 F.3d 1156, 1161–62 (10th Cir.1998); Blake v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:03 am
Robert Blake (with M. [read post]