Search for: "In Re Levinson"
Results 161 - 180
of 321
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Aziz Rana Sanford Levinson’s scholarship has long been a central influence on my own work. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 5:49 pm
"Lack of administrative experience" - Again, we're confounded on what this truly means. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
They’re good, very good. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:00 pm
So you’re Jeremy. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 4:35 am
Why bother printing the text if you're going to make it impossible for much of the audience to follow. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 6:10 pm
" Cantor further said that "what I don't think the White House understands is how difficult it is for fiscal conservatives to say they're going to vote to pay for a debt ceiling increase. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 3:00 am
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224, 239 n.17 (1988). [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 5:55 am
If they are right, then standard courses in law school should be re-titled 'Constitutional Politics' and 'Administrative Politics', not to mention 'International Politics', and perhaps even moved out of the law schools and into political science departments. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 9:41 am
[ADDENDUM: I should have been clearer in my original post that the "institutional warfare" is a function of what Rick Pildes and Darryl Levinson have called the "separation of parties" more than the "separation of powers" per se. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
As Balkin and Levinson have shown in a different context, in the world of "citology," "it's a jungle out there! [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 7:43 pm
Legal Adviser Koh’s statement on drones and its explicit appeal to legitimate self-defense apart from armed conflict, as a basis for targeting (and agreeing here with Serwer, including targeting Americans), is simultaneously a break with Bush administration policy (even while, in one sense, broadening it), and a re-affirmation of a legal policy going back to the Reagan-Bush years. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
This is the conclusion Judge Stephen Reinhart reached in The Matter of Levinson (9th Cir. 2009). [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 3:30 am
Res. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 11:49 am
Levinson. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 2:16 pm
But as Rick Pildes and Daryl (no relation) Levinson accurate have pointed out, it's "separation of parties," not of powers, that define our system in most important respects. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 4:49 am
The first festchrift volume is still available (at the list price of $45), though I am reliably informed that the supply of the first volume is running low and so if this is something you're going to want, I hope you'll get it soon. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 6:25 am
(Incidentally, while we're talking about the back of the book, I think Columbia deserves praise for having and using essay editors in a fashion that has distinctly improved the overall product.) [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 7:24 pm
Legal Adviser Koh’s statement on drones and its explicit appeal to legitimate self-defense apart from armed conflict, as a basis for targeting (and agreeing here with Serwer, including targeting Americans), is simultaneously a break with Bush administration policy (even while, in one sense, broadening it), and a re-affirmation of a legal policy going back to the Reagan-Bush years. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 10:45 am
Sandy Levinson tells some of this in his extended review of G. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 9:27 am
Editorial comment added by Levinson.] [read post]
