Search for: "In Re Linn" Results 161 - 164 of 164
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2007, 1:01 pm
"  Because the "signals" claimed here are "made by man" and not "laws of nature, physical phenomena, [or] abstract ideas," Judge Linn would have found the claims drawn to statutory subject matter.More detail of In re Nuijten after the jump. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:46 pm
Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303, 308-09 (1980) (setting forth the history of section 101 and concluding that Congress has repeatedly re-enacted language originally drafted by Thomas Jefferson in 1793). [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 4:27 pm
SASM&F ******************************** If you're a Skadden associate in a class other than 2003, please provide your new base salary in the comments. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 5:18 am
I believe the time has come for us to re-examine Cybor's no deference rule. [read post]