Search for: "In Re MacKenzie" Results 161 - 169 of 169
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am by INFORRM
The final week of module one brought the Leveson Inquiry to an explosive, if temporary, conclusion. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
But if you do, yet still allow your editors to use inciteful over insightful language, then far from standing up for Britain, you’re a menace against all things that make it great“. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 10:44 am by Jordan Brunner
Mackenzie Eaglen will moderate. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Works that have already been considered for this prize may not be re-submitted. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal AI Deepfakes in Campaigns May Be Detectable, But Will It Matter? [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 9:18 am by Michael Oykhman
You’re aware that the item does not ever sell on the general market for such a low price, however, you buy the item anyways. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 5:00 am by Lev Sugarman
.), Jimmy Panetta (D-Calif.) and Mackenzie Eaglen. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
[Some legal history and doctrinal suggestions.] [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
It wasn’t until Bill C-34 was re-introduced as Bill C-2 (39-1) in 2007 that the Federal Accountability Act, and the Conflict of Interest Act the following year, turned these principles were turned into statute. [read post]