Search for: "In Re Medical Review Panel" Results 161 - 180 of 893
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2015, 9:22 am by Eugene Volokh
But it’s possible that some patients (especially in rural areas, a point the panel opinion makes) might find that there are few doctors around, especially if they’re looking for specialists. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm by Maureen Johnston
At its Conference on December 12, 2014, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as removability under the Class Action Fairness Act, the constitutionality of an Arizona law limiting the availability of abortions performed with medication, and the presumption of judicial vindictiveness under North Carolina v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 6:24 am
Previous investigations, notably by the FBI, had raised the possibility that the symptoms had a psychological origin, not a physical one, outraging many sufferers who felt their pain had been marginalized and their claims not taken seriously by medical personnel....So it seems the real conclusion is that it's a psychological problem, but they're afraid to say it directly. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:47 am
An expert witness testified to the medical review panel that the decedent was properly diagnosed and treated, despite the fact that she was treated for a condition she did not have. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 4:38 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
   Thursday 7 March, 2019 08.30-09.00Registration & Welcome Coffee 09.00-09.10Welcome by the Chair of the Scientific Committee – Kenneth Chambaere (BE) 09.10-09.30Introduction by an external speaker (TBC) Plenary 1: Latest developments in assisted dying around the world 09.30-10.00Developments in European countries – Agnes van der Heide (NL) 10.00-10.30Recent developments and the future of MAiD in Canada – Jocelyn Downie (CAN) 10.30-11.00A review of… [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
In 2018 President Trump jacked up tariffs on solar panels to "protect the domestic solar panel industry. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm by Bexis
  We did that not too long ago and came up with a new law review article, Samuel Raymond, “Judicial Politics & Medical Device Preemption After Riegel,” 5 N.Y.U.J.L. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 6:16 am by Ithands
  Under the Indiana Medical Malpractice Act, medical providers who elect for coverage under the Act are reviewed by a medical review panel. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 8:45 pm by James Romoser and Andrew Hamm
The Supreme Court then sent the Indiana case back to the 7th Circuit with instructions for that court to re-evaluate the parental-notification law in light of June Medical. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:49 am
Ex. 2 is 10/27/06 QMS Transaction # 68137 Summary Report re the write-off for the patient fall. [read post]
A panel of five judges in the Scottish High Court of Justiciary upheld the late Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi’s conviction for 270 counts of murder. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 1:15 pm by Eric Alexander
”  What followed was a meeting with the manufacturer, a re-review of the third application by a new team, a second Advisory Panel Meeting, a recommendation from the review team that the device was “not substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicates,” and notification to the manufacturer that prior clearance would be rescinded and the product re-classified to Class III (PMA). [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 12:34 pm
Last week, a panel of the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the District Court’s decision in an unpublished opinion. [read post]
10 May 2010, 9:51 am by Steve Hall
To determine his eligibility for those benefits, three separate government physicians performed medical and psychological examinations on him. [read post]