Search for: "In Re Opinion of Supreme Court, Etc." Results 161 - 180 of 986
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2015, 7:22 am by Steve Kalar
Supreme Court nor the Ninth Circuit has squarely addressed whether cell phone users possess a reasonable expectation of privacy in the CSLI . . . associated with their cell phones . . . . [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
On Wednesday, May 5, 2010, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 3:04 pm by Terry Lenamon
  In the Court's news release detailing the appointment, Garringer's credentials are detailed - they include serving as a Monroe County judge (1977 - 1980) and for the past 7 years, serving as staff attorney to the Supreme Court Criminal Court Steering Committee and the Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 3:49 am by Russ Bensing
The Supreme Court’s 2004 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 3:09 am by Patrick Maines
A case being petitioned for review by the Supreme Court will, if accepted, tell us a lot about the future of broadcasting. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 10:57 am
I suspect that this opinion is right, and that certification to the California Supreme Court isn't required because the federal courts can figure out the correct answer themselves. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 3:17 am by Liz Dunshee
Here’s something Ngozi blogged yesterday on PracticalESG.com: At the end of June, the Supreme Court, powered by its 6-3 conservative majority, issued its expected opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 2:55 pm
"Given this description, I was supremely confident of how the Court of Appeal would come out. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 12:01 pm
  But that's not actually the standard the Supreme Court set. [read post]
Second, everyone thought that this issue was dead after the Supreme Court issued the Dewsnup opinion. [read post]
11 May 2022, 3:51 pm by Joseph Fishkin
But then, the Supreme Court doesn’t make a habit of leaking possible majority opinions. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:11 am
  They're generally the ones in immigration court and, thus, potentially illegally obtained. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 12:30 am
- Decoding the decision of the Supreme Court in Shriram's case1. [read post]