Search for: "In Re Standard Power & Light Corporation"
Results 161 - 180
of 657
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2023, 5:39 am
Fighting for the sake of fighting, power for the sake of power, conflict for the sake of conflict, gets us n [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm
It’s a multi-year battle that may need to be revised many times as we better understand the tools and authorities of entities engaged in mass surveillance and as more disclosures by whistleblowers help shine light on surveillance abuses. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 5:56 am
Explain what it is you're doing. [read post]
24 May 2019, 10:56 am
On page 104, she also addressed this problem of Qualcomm using non-standard-essential patents such as EP'461 against Intel-powered Apple devices in order to bring Apple back into the Qualcomm fold:"Once Apple started purchasing modem chips from Intel, Apple challenged Qualcomm’s royalty rates, as Tony Blevins (Apple Vice President of Procurement) testified at trial: 'There are court proceedings where we’re trying to establish what is a FRAND rate… [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 12:17 pm
WARREN: What -- what you're saying is ignore the law. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 3:03 pm
It focuses on the existing law on whether a court has the power under All Writs Act to order Apple’s assistance. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:20 am
Claim Construction: Universal Lighting Technologies, Inc., v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 10:14 am
For example, the Act permits vacatur “where the arbitrators exceeded their powers. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
During Mark Zuckerberg’s 10-plus hours of testimony before Congress on April 10 and 11, the Facebook CEO was asked at least six times about his company’s alleged censorship of conservative internet personalities Diamond and Silk—to the point where New York Times technology reporter Kevin Roose commented, “I think if you were an alien who dropped down to earth to observe the testimony … you would think there was no one on earth who was more important than Diamond and… [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 9:36 am
The Administration’s proposed standard is weak. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am
HP, No 15-1330 (separation of powers and right to jury trial). [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 11:10 pm
At issue is whether Magellan Corporation ("Magellan") is a co-owner of the '346 patent. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 12:10 pm
The court let her in, id. at 3 (which we don’t like), but not before her wings were significantly clipped by the excision of many of the most objectionable aspects of her testimony, those being: “medical causation, corporate state of mind, industry standards, monitoring of the clinical trials and ‘ghostwriting’. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 8:58 am
This from a report in 2011:Yesterday the House Foreign Affairs Committee held a hearing to re-examine U.S. aid to the Palestinian Authority in light of its plan to go to the UN rather than negotiate with Israel. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm
In light of capture, and in light of the value of music, the Court should engage in more searching review. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 2:31 pm
Although these types of claims remain difficult for plaintiffs to withstand motions to dismiss under Caremark standards, the business judgment rule should remain a powerful defense if the suits are ultimately tried. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 1:23 pm
In addition, the Court of Chancery found that an entire fairness review was inappropriate because, among other reasons, an "entire fairness review would be inconsistent with the broad power allocated to directors. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 10:50 am
Power & Light Co. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 12:25 pm
Lighting Ballast Control; and Achates v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 2:20 pm
That was certainly the ideal behind the Second Pillar corporate responsibility to respect human rights. [read post]
