Search for: "In Re Thinking MacHines Corp."
Results 161 - 180
of 247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2011, 3:32 pm
" In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Prods. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:58 am
When thinking about bussiness methods, not exclusive to machines per se. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 2:44 am
., Opposition No. 91185706 [Section 2(d) opposition to TEMP-RITE for mattresses, mattress toppers, pillows, stuffing material, and the like, in view of the mark TEMPUR for mattresses, cushions, pillows, and the like].February 9, 2011 - 11 AM: In re U.S. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 10:55 pm
Don’t you dare think what you’re thinking about me right now… there’ll be a link at the end and you can read the story for your-damn-self. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:58 pm
If you’re one of those who tinted your Twitter avatar green as an expression of solidarity with Iranian “Green Movement” dissidents, Morozov’s view is that, at best, you’re wasting your time and, at worst, you’re aiding and abetting tyrants by engaging in a form of “slacktivism” that has little hope of advancing real regime change. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 11:31 am
Paper Converting Machine Co., 694 F. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:22 am
We’re starting to see positive signs. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 8:07 pm
Here is Think IP Strategy’s weekly selection of top Online intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
Bunn-O-Matic Corp. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
In Colombini a patient being examined in the machine was killed when struck by a stray piece of metal (an oxygen tank) that somebody left in the room to be drawn in by the magnetism the machine generated while in use.How that kind of error would make the machine's manufacturer liable we don’t know – and fortunately we don’t have to worry about that, because MRI machines are Class III devices to which Riegel preemption applies.Except… [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
We're talking about the Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §2, to be precise. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 4:30 am
Sabinsa Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am
And sometimes the way the USPTO thinks the patent laws should be applied differs from how the courts think the patent laws should be applied. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 10:15 am
” In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943, 954, aff’d, 561 U.S. ___ (2010). [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
Did the police officer continuously observe you for the entire 15 minutes before she you blew into the breath machine? [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:45 am
Hugs and kisses… that’s just adorable, don’t you think? [read post]
11 May 2010, 11:40 am
Meanwhile, the volcano will continue to do whatever it’s going to do, utterly indifferent to our silly little human machinations. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 11:10 pm
(quoting FilmTec Corp. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 1:42 pm
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., 2000 WL 33915848 (E.D. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:39 am
(Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Jury finds for plaintiff in VirnetX v Microsoft (EDTexweblog.com) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Microsoft - Microsoft sues maker of four-minute exercise machine for typosquatting: Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
