Search for: "In Re US Lines, Inc."
Results 161 - 180
of 3,846
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2023, 10:43 am
In line with its tradition of excellence, Chambers and Partners has announced the release of the 2023 Litigation Support Guide for the USA today. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:46 am
Ford Motor Company, Inc., --- F.4th ----, 2023 WL 4377585, No. 22-10575 (11th Cir. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:30 pm
’ Foreclosure, meanwhile, occurs when a firm uses one line of business to disadvantage rivals in another line. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 10:04 am
CareDx, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
But notably the opinion had nothing to say about this line of reasoning. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 2:13 pm
City of Miami General Employees’ and Sanitation Employees’ Retirement Trust, 107 A.3d 1049 (Del. 2014), and In re Trulia, Inc. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
Hetronic International Inc., the Supreme Court held that the Lanham Act does not reach trademark infringement that occurs outside of the United States (US). [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 4:51 pm
QC Energy Res. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
” Justice Crane identified the competing, foundational cases as the Court of Appeals’ 1949 opinion in Sterling Industries Inc. v Ball Bearing Pen Corp. and its 1958 opinion in Paloma Frocks, Inc. v Shamokin Sportwear Corp. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 12:05 pm
Ahrend can enlighten us. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:00 am
The TM part of this might need revisiting in light of Abitron; the court earlier held that use of a mark in the US wasn’t required to bring Lanham Act claims, but subsequently Meenaxi Enterprise, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 9:52 am
” The Groff Decision Represents a Shift in Evaluating Title VII Religious Accommodation Claims The Supreme Court used this case as an opportunity to re-examine the meaning of “undue hardship. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 8:52 am
An interesting counterpoint to the retroactivity analysis in Weld County is Judge Katsas’s opinion in ITServe Alliance, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:18 am
On June 21, the FTC filed a complaint alleging that: For years, Defendant Amazon.com, Inc. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:49 pm
Summer is here and we’re back with another edition of the Cost Corner, where we provide practical insight into the complex cost and pricing requirements that apply to Government contractors. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Here are ideas that can be grouped into three categories: (1) greater use of private ordering to manage shareholder proposals; (2) exclude proposals on social policy issues that lack a material relationship with the company; and (3) changes to how the Commission staff processes shareholder proposals. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:45 am
In line with Colorado law, the trial court assessed the true-threat issue using an “objective ‘reasonable person’ standard. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
”[2] The time is indeed ripe for us to re-examine how we assess bank mergers under the statutory framework that Congress has enacted. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 10:13 am
“We don’t even have an outline of the plan to help us understand the billions of dollars of changes they are proposing. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 4:50 pm
” Freeding-Skokie Roll-Off Service, Inc. v. [read post]
