Search for: "In re Admin. Order No. 10"
Results 161 - 180
of 184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2010, 11:09 am
In re vFinance Investments Inc., SEC, Admin. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 3:38 am
The firms ranked 8-10 are all the same, but for General Corporate the order was Cleary, Kirkland, Weil, instead of as above. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 2:31 pm
& Admin. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 10:00 pm
The Video Recordings Act 1984 made it an offence to supply pornographic videos “from” rather than “in” a licensed sex shop (Section 12); it was also an offence under the Act (Section 10 (1)) to supply videos with no classification certificate. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:01 pm
Commentary The judge in OM found that because BA meant that the claimant in fact had an in-country right of appeal when the Secretary of State decided not to revoke the deportation order, the Secretary of State should by rights have served him with written notice of his decision and informing him of his right of appeal (as provided for by the Immigration (Notices) Regulations 2003) within 5 days of the decision if he was in detention and 10 days if he was not. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
HT Window Fashions Corp (Docket Report) District Court N D Ohio: Deliberate copying, litigation conduct warrant $10 million enhanced damages award [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:34 am
If the person is seeking admission or re-admission to the industry; and1. the person is subject to an order under Exchange Act Section 15(b)(4)(H)(i), then the person must file an application unless the order imposing a bar on the person is time-limited and the time period is expired. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:37 am
Rights under the Convention are recognised even though they are not to be found in pre-Human Rights Act common or statute law; so for example private and family life is recognised as a right even though it was not in itself a civil right before the HRA transformed its position (In re S (Minors) (Care Order: Implementation of Care Plan) [2002] UKHL 10). [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:39 am
Shipley (Docket Report) TTAB reverses 2(d) refusal of FLEXILOGIC for noise reduction software over same mark for software design services: In re STMicroelectronics NV (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Hulu - Hulavision alleges Hulu and parent company NBC Universal not only stole its trade secrets before launching Hulu, but stole its trademark as well (Ars Technica) [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 6:37 pm
Order Tonawanda Coke Corp. to Clean Up Multiple Issues. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 2:25 pm
Order Tonawanda Coke Corp. to Clean Up Multiple Issues. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 8:38 pm
” Id. 10 The rule allows the parents 20 days in which to file a pro se brief after an order granting the motion to withdraw is issued. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 5:45 am
If a $10K research tool is needed in order to help on a $1 million matter, then so be it. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
Servs, No. 08-441ADEA/Must a plaintiff present direct evidence of discrimination in order to obtain a mixed-motive instruction in a non-Title VII discrimination case? [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Servs, No. 08-441ADEA Must a plaintiff present direct evidence of discrimination in order to obtain a mixed-motive instruction in a non-Title VII discrimination case? [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 3:27 am
That position had been further explained by Kay v LB Lambeth; Price v Leeds CC [2006] UKHL 10. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 3:27 am
That position had been further explained by Kay v LB Lambeth; Price v Leeds CC [2006] UKHL 10. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
December 3, 2008)(Unpub)Affirming dismissal of pro-se Admin Asst's race, HWE and retal claims regarding reclassification/promotion Cecil v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
Servs, No. 08-441ADEA/Must a plaintiff present direct evidence of discrimination in order to obtain a mixed-motive instruction in a non-Title VII discrimination case? [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 6:30 pm
Bankruptcy 08b0020p.06 In re: Janice B. [read post]
