Search for: "In re Amendments to the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules"
Results 161 - 180
of 279
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am
Apple will have to pin its hopes for Supreme Court glory on the Samsung case. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
It is the spirit of the Supreme Court’s decision in Romer v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
In re Sharp 15-646Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 11:30 am
Instead, at least as the court interpreted it, the defendant made a Rule 703 challenge to attempts to rely on what Dr. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:40 am
But NOM lost that fight when the Supreme Judicial Court ordered it to hand over the list of donors. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 8:12 am
” And, the North Carolina Supreme Court has held that attorney-client privilege is “critical to effective assistance of counsel. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Heidelberg traveled to Oklahoma and contacted Neese. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Heidelberg traveled to Oklahoma and contacted Neese. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:29 am
Gross, in which the Court upheld the use of midazolam in Oklahoma’s lethal injection protocol, have asked the Supreme Court to rehear their case on the basis of Justice Stephen Breyer’s call in his dissent for a full re-examination of capital punishment. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
At its heart was the Court’s recognition that telling same-sex couples that they’re unfit to share in the institution of civil marriage sends LGBT individuals an official message of inferiority – teaching a lesson government officials are forbidden to teach, whatever their intentions. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 11:53 am
But – absent a change of personnel – don’t expect the Supreme Court to re-enter the fray anytime soon. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:10 am
But this approach doesn’t have Supreme Court support at this point. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am
University of Texas at Austin 14-981 Issue: Whether the Fifth Circuit’s re-endorsement of the University of Texas at Austin’s use of racial preferences in undergraduate admissions decisions can be sustained under this Court’s decisions interpreting the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, including Fisher v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 4:16 pm
In 2008, the Supreme Court rejected an argument that Kentucky’s lethal injection procedures violated the Eighth Amendment, which prohibits “cruel and unusual punishment,” because of the possibility that the inmate could suffer serious pain if the procedures were not followed properly. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Two other state supreme courts have reaffirmed the learned intermediary rule since then, Wyeth, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:30 pm
Friday afternoon, the Supreme Court announced that it would hear Glossip v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 4:53 am
The Florida Bar, in which the Court will consider whether a rule that prohibits candidates for judgeships from personally soliciting campaign funds violates the First Amendment. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am
However, an interesting new initiative has recently emerged – the attempt to achieve litigation reform through amendments to corporate bylaws. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Indeed, under the 1992 Supreme Court ruling in New York v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:38 am
(In re Revlon, Inc. [read post]
