Search for: "In re Answers Corporation Shareholders Litigation" Results 161 - 180 of 291
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2012, 11:33 am by Francis Pileggi
Without authority to assert a corporation’s claim, the shareholder in the first case was asserting their own claim to obtain equitable authority to sue. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:12 am by Roy Ginsburg
Under certain circumstances, a corporation has the ability – and sometimes the duty – to indemnify its officers, directors, employees, or agents against liability in litigation related to that person’s corporate role. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 3:14 am by Stan
But I honestly believe that more information is the answer. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:50 am by Theo Francis
Given all that, in the absence of a real possibility to completely overturn the decision, we’re thinking it’s probably not the best use of the shareholders money. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Unlike subchapter S close corporations that generally cannot have other limited liability entities as shareholders, LLCs often include in their membership ranks multi-shareholder corporations and/or multi-member LLCs which may in turn be composed of other multi-member LLCs. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Unlike subchapter S close corporations that generally cannot have other limited liability entities as shareholders, LLCs often include in their membership ranks multi-shareholder corporations and/or multi-member LLCs which may in turn be composed of other multi-member LLCs. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:50 pm by Edward M. McNally
In re Answers Corporation Shareholders Litigation, C.A. 6170-VCN (April 11, 2012) Directors who are also officers have an interest in a merger when they are to retain their jobs in the merged company. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
Among the important questions that will need to be answered in connection with the current wave of failed bank litigation is the question of extent to which the non-director officers will be able to defend themselves in reliance on the business judgment rule. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:50 am by Edward M. McNally
The recent decision by the Court of Chancery in In re Celera Shareholders Litigation, Del. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:55 am by Michael Sirkin
Target boards are no longer subject to shareholder discipline because the acquirer will buy out the target’s shareholders. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 5:01 am by Steve Harms
I use the word “potential” because the corporation can re-file itself and erase the personal liability. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 4:58 pm by Francis Pileggi
Strine’s willingness to skewer fat cats cropped up again yesterday in his opinion in the In re El Paso Corporation Shareholder Litigation case. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 7:29 am by Jordan Furlong
(S&G is the world’s first publicly traded law firm, which means its owners include all sorts of non-lawyer shareholders.) [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 9:08 am by Joe Palazzolo
“You’re not seeing the times that waivers aren’t being granted, because the companies don’t ask when they know the answer will be no. [read post]