Search for: "In re Banks (1979)" Results 161 - 180 of 274
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2021, 9:35 am by Russell Knight
Credit card companies and banks are governed by federal law…where marijuana is still illegal. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 5:29 am
  30 years ago in 1979, I sat in your seats. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:48 am
  Cohen is the most recent California appellate court Opinion to comment on the treatment of UCL claims by In re Tobacco II Cases, 46 Cal.4th 298 (2009), the prior two decisions being Kaldenbach v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 1:20 pm
ZHANG Taisu– Legality and Political Legitimacy in Contemporary China: Theoretical GroundworkZHANG Xianchu– Commercial Law in China: 1979-2019ZHENG Wentong– China’s Antitrust ExperimentZHU Ciyun– The Historical Development of China’s Company Law __________Schedule for the Michigan Law School and Lieberthal Rogel Center for Chinese Studies at the University of Michigan Conference“China’s Legal Construction Program at 40 Years –… [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 10:38 am by dawn
We’re beginning to see a growing international interest in cracking down on corporate tax dodging, and with $717.8 billion on the line, it’s time for the U.S. to start doing the same. [read post]
21 Feb 2006, 10:01 pm
In re Steingbrecher, 110 B.R. 155 (Bankr. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:00 am by Dr. Cassandra Steer
  Our daily activities, from email, phone calls and Facebook to every automatic bank transaction you make, are dependent on satellite technologies. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 6:50 am by Russell Knight
When it comes to dividing non-qualified deferred compensation plans, you’re on your own. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 6:44 pm
Beijing's one-child policy, introduced in 1979, has worked its way up the population pyramid such that China's supply of rural workers ages 20 to 29 will halve by 2030. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 10:27 pm
The Black CatIf you see only one Universal horror classic, you’re probably going to watch Dracula. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am by Bernard Bell
See note 9, infra (discussing such comments in In re Franklin National Bank Securities Litigation and Bank of Dearborn v. [read post]