Search for: "In re Bartlett"
Results 161 - 180
of 437
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2014, 1:24 pm
Bartlett, 133 S. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 1:35 pm
Indeed, the FDA still seems wilfully oblivious to the revolution in First Amendment jurispurdence that has since occurred.We’re most concerned with the guidance as it applies to clinical and scientific articles and reprints. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 7:49 am
Recently, theNew York Times highlighted examples of re-purposing which are on-going throughout the country. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 5:49 am
Recently, theNew York Times highlighted examples of re-purposing which are on-going throughout the country. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 2:50 pm
The lesson Jilani draws from his experience is that “we’re all a little like RT America,” referring to the Russian media programming that tends to align its coverage and commentary with the positions of the Russian government. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
PLAC has demonstrably been on the front lines of prescription medical product liability litigation throughout this period:· Bartlett v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:53 am
See Bartlett v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:00 pm
Bartlett, 133 S. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
This post is not from the Dechert side of the blog, because of that firm's involvement in this matter.We mentioned, in the “here’s what’s out there” portion of our 2013 Top Ten post that “The long-pending Lance case (2010 #-6) remains undecided by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, some three years after oral argument. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 11:24 am
And the court found both claims preempted under Mensing and Bartlett. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:25 am
Bartlett, 133 S. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:16 am
Super. 2013), and In re Reglan/Metoclopramide Litigation, 74 A.3d 221 (Pa. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:12 am
The express language of these regulations – “required by” the FDA – places warnings about off-label uses in the prescription drug context squarely within the realm of “impossibility” preemption under the Levine-Mensing-Bartlett line of Supreme Court authority, since off-label use warnings are not something that a drug manufacturer can add to its label unilaterally without prior FDA approval. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 8:35 pm
Also indicted, but not arrested, were David Guel, 60, and his wife, Mary Gleason, 48, both of Blue Island, Illinois; Muntazer Ali Saiyed, also known as “Monty Saiyed,” 37, Bartlett; Saged Ansari, 32, Hanover Park, Illinois; and Azeem Syed, 30, Bolingbrook, Illinois. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:41 am
Bartlett, 133 S. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Bruce Bartlett is a prominent example of a person whose early career involved stints in some of the most conse [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Bartlett, 678 F.3d 30 (1st Cir. 2012), rev’d, 133 S. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Bartlett, 133 S. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
But now we’re the ones who are speculating, aren’t we? [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
., 712 F.3d 60 (1st Cir. 2013) – all of which also travel under the heading, In re Neurontin Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation. [read post]
